tukelully

4 ms·

1.
by tukelully 9y ago
Alot of these things do matter and it seems to me like all you're doing here is excusing bloat via hyperbole. I don't even agree necessarily with a lot of the parent comment, but I disagree with yours.
2.
by tukelully 10y ago
I think it may be a worthwhile question and I'm curious why you think this. Why shouldn't they? Is there a objective measurable reason remote employees shouldn't be paid the same?
3.
by tukelully 10y ago
Could you expand on that?
4.
by tukelully 10y ago
Of course it's worth noting that in a "remote-first"—a term I love and a principle I can get behind—environment, these people wouldn't have anything to do.
5.
by tukelully 10y ago
My comment was actually sarcasm, but it's worth discussing. What you describe is one way that an ideal process can work, but actually make things worse when put into practice by people whose job it is to meetings. You want to batch the
6.
by tukelully 10y ago
But how do you plan to be productive if you miss the daily scrum? Same experience here.
7.
by tukelully 10y ago
Do you mean that you spent to much time with not much to show and now have an apparent gap in work history? Is it more of a present feeling of being lost in the weeds of those projects?
8.
by tukelully 10y ago
Very good good point. That's something that's certainly crossed my mind a number of times and still does.
9.
by tukelully 10y ago
If anyone is interested in some specifics that I skipped over for the sake of brevity (lol) I'll keep an eye on this thread.
10.
by tukelully 10y ago
+1 internets for you. I wrote about my experience extensively in this thread. Didn't make any reference to these specifically but they pretty well hold true and existed where I last worked. Not so compelling for modern developers.
11.
by tukelully 10y ago
On Real Burnout —————————————— TL:DR; (Worth the read though) I recently—early last year—faced real burnout for the first time and it has had devastating effects for quite some time. Up until then I considered myself to have some level of f
12.
by tukelully 10y ago
I love this. It's such a depressingly accurate and concise depiction of the last office I worked in.
13.
by tukelully 10y ago
That certainly sounds nice but it's not true. Or at the very least depends on how you define software. If software is built upon an evolving platform (such as the web) and has a self-supplying revenue stream if it needs one at all, the
14.
by tukelully 10y ago
Every comment you've made in this thread has a tone of defensiveness and a lack of anything constructive as if everyone here is personally threatening you.
15.
by tukelully 10y ago
Wow. Significantly slower than the IDEs I used to think were bloated JVM beasts.
16.
by tukelully 10y ago
I believe the reason it's stalled is because the single developer moved to Berlin and has been pretty busy with that for a while. But, he does still seem committed and occasionally updates on Twitter. Only mentioning because I was curi
17.
by tukelully 10y ago
Just for comparison, this costs the same per month as a one-time purchase of Quiver (a notes app for people that don't fit the late nineties definition of creative) which is amazing, 3x the cost of a base DigitalOcean vps, ~5x the cost
18.
by tukelully 10y ago
A contrived analogy for this might be something like "Why wouldn't you delete the data once you've rendered a graph of it in PNG?". Data is always important. Just as much so as it's original interpretation and const
19.
by tukelully 10y ago
Does this carry over to federal agencies as well? I know the state of access to journals and papers published by universities is a shitshow but don't know how it is at the government level.
20.
by tukelully 10y ago
In your first sentence which actions are you referring to?
21.
by tukelully 10y ago
How successful is the effort to convince clinate deniers as of right now? I see this as an archival effort. If the source is destroyed, this data, among everything else being archived, will still be around and publicly accessible by anyone
22.
by tukelully 10y ago
"A peek under the purple rug!" sounds awfully suggestive. I hope that's as obvious to everyone else.
23.
by tukelully 10y ago
In fairness, your question hardly reads as a question and much more like a halfhearted sigh from someone who hasn't given it much thought. In response to the mention of Google backing it, I don't see how how that should discredit
24.
by tukelully 10y ago
Which is a large cost no question. Especially with the size of the codebase you mentioned. What I'm interested in is how, if at all, the transition process is managed. YouTube's transition from Flash might be an example of this. T
25.
by tukelully 10y ago
I'm curious how the ongoing support of Flash applications on the web compares to the support of Java applets on the web. I don't know much about the latter, but if anyone here is engaged in supporting a legacy Java applet I'd
26.
by tukelully 10y ago
Is there some sort of process in place for mitigating the potential "1 step forward, 2 steps back" path of adding features in ActionScript and then having to eventually port them?
27.
by tukelully 10y ago
I'm sure my chosen password of kkkkkk will prove useful.
28.
by tukelully 10y ago
I think you were in the right and didn't really assume as much as suggested. I got the same impression particularly because of the language chosen. "non-negotiable" implies that there was a second party to necessitate negotia
29.
by tukelully 10y ago
It depends on the organization.
30.
by tukelully 10y ago
It appears worth noting to the people arguing for functional programming over OO in response to this, that this is about toxicity within the team and maturity of the developer. Not programming style in so much as I can read. It should also

More ›