tugu77

8 ms·

1.
by tugu77 2y ago
It's obvious that you don't, and that's why a number of people have pointed it out to you.
2.
by tugu77 2y ago
It's not misleading or ambiguous. As a bystander to this discussion I'm shaking my head wondering whether you are doing this on purpose. The vast majority of employed people have a single reasonable choice: to take their employers
3.
by tugu77 2y ago
The EU has certainly its issues, no doubt about it. They need to be pointed out and addressed for sure. We are not in disagreement there. But the flat out denial that EU is in principle a democratic system is just a too simplistic view. It
4.
by tugu77 2y ago
51.4% is a majority. You are free to disagree again, but that won't change the facts. You can just as easily disagree about gravity, evolution or climate change. Still won't change them. Look, I don't like lots of things abou
5.
by tugu77 2y ago
Um, joining the EU is not the same as joining the Euro. They can keep doing this exact thing after joining the EU if they keep their currency just like a few others are doing. No, this is mostly about fishing rights afaik. Britain also kept
6.
by tugu77 2y ago
That's a lot of BS. The European Parliament is elected every few years by citizens in all member states. The European Commission is nominated by the European Council and and confirmed by the European Parliament. The European Council co
7.
by tugu77 2y ago
How widespread is LLM cheating during video interviews these days? Honest question.. How do people even do it? Let an LLM app listen in and suggest avenues of discussion and lists a bunch of facts on the side to spice things up? Even if tha
8.
by tugu77 2y ago
I didn't claim anything about identifying writing. That's a strawman. I'm talking about humans talking to each other. Even if it's in a zoom call. Any interview process that doesn't include that is broken, and that&
9.
by tugu77 2y ago
An interviewer is a "victim"? Maybe they should just, you know, speak to their interviewees. At least in 2024 that's hardly faked by an LLM. Therefore, if you are fooled, you cheaped out, and you are hardly a victim.
10.
by tugu77 2y ago
> But I also think we gained something. [...] plane tickets are ridiculously cheap if you are not too picky. Not really a gain if you ask me.. The melting glaciers are agreeing with me and they are not impressed by the downvotes I'l
11.
by tugu77 2y ago
> At this point every remote internet checklist has to include checks for humanity, I genuinely don't understand this requirement. Isn't an interview exactly that? It's a conversation pretending to be about a technical pro
12.
by tugu77 2y ago
As much as I'd like to support the overall sentiment of the article, or at least of the part that I actually read, the stats just don't pass the smell test. > If you’re like one of the Americans surveyed by Reviews.org, this is
13.
by tugu77 2y ago
If you think that a $3.27 deal includes compensation for multi-million losses then your expectations of how businesses work need re-adjusting.
14.
by tugu77 2y ago
We have different ideas about what "linear" means.
15.
by tugu77 2y ago
Put it in an otherwise airgapped dmz.
16.
by tugu77 2y ago
Combine the two. By default, return nonsense on all ports. But once a certain access sequence has been detected from a source IP, redirect traffic to a specific port from just that IP to your real service.
17.
by tugu77 2y ago
A useful trick is to then at least visually structure those 150 lines with comments that separate some blocks of functionality. Keeps the linear flow but makes it still easier to digest.
18.
by tugu77 2y ago
I know your comment is a little tongue-in-cheek, but that kind of thinking is in fact widespread and a reason why many of us are so miserable.
19.
by tugu77 2y ago
Re: complex conditionals I contributed some code to a FOSS project recently which is written in C. In my 10 lines of contributions, 3 were a complex conditional. I'd have loved to do what the article suggests, with some intermediate bo
20.
by tugu77 2y ago
> We were told that a really smart developer had contributed to it. Lots of cool architectures, fancy libraries and trendy technologies were used. In other words, the author had created a high cognitive load for us. Maybe that dev was &q
21.
by tugu77 2y ago
Power of LLMs. Bring any book down to as short as you like. Or as long, if that's more your alley.
22.
by tugu77 2y ago
Thats all fine, but I think you are missing the bigger picture. It's not about whether what we already got out of this is good. Of course it is. But this is about where it's going. Until about 120 years ago, people were happy with
23.
by tugu77 2y ago
> I have done this kind of optimization to go from 24 hour compute time to 6 hour compute time instead for instance -- per simulation run. I'm sure there are workloads where this kind of optimization makes a lot of sense. But they a
24.
by tugu77 2y ago
This thing should be a poster example of premature optimization. Sure you can squeeze a few milliseconds out in a performance critical task. Most things won't measurably benefit though, while making all handling super awkward. If your
25.
by tugu77 2y ago
Yeah, especially the people scamming others.
26.
by tugu77 2y ago
Easy for me to be a smartass in hindsight, but I can't resist: > Unfortunately for Griffin, years ago he used Google Photos to store an image of the secret seed phrase that was protecting his cryptocurrency wallet. Um, duh... > &
27.
by tugu77 2y ago
I'd love to see some imagination on that page beyond some star shapes.
28.
by tugu77 2y ago
For a professional musician you are oddly singer/violin focused. Any instrument which can physically detune while playing has their musicians do this. On wind instruments it's via the mouthpiece, any string instrument beyond violi
29.
by tugu77 2y ago
100% this. For a C++ or Rust programmer this reads so weird. Don't get me wrong, I'm not hating on JS here, and I have lots of beef with C++, but I fully agree with your take that TS barely scratches the surface of the statically
30.
by tugu77 2y ago
The diagrams look nice, but in the end of the day, they are merely nice visualizations of what's fundamentally algebra. There is not much geometry going on besides a quite simple group structure of order 12.

More ›