tuesdaynight

5 ms·

1.
by tuesdaynight 4d ago
Yes? I mean, I'm not saying that they are necessarily wrong about the risks, but it's pretty hard to ignore how conveniently their positions align with a regulation capture that their companies are going for. If they all left, tha
2.
by tuesdaynight 6d ago
Yes. There were cases already where a person asked about killing someone and then Anthropic/OpenAI warned the police about it. If I'm not mistaken, it was not in the USA only
3.
by tuesdaynight 6d ago
If you plan to be an employee at some company, you will need to use LLMs. If you plan to go self-employed, then you can avoid LLMs as long as possible. I wouldn't do that, but I'm not you. However, I urge people that avoid LLMs en
4.
by tuesdaynight 7d ago
I agree with you, but have you tried talking to people in real life about it? Almost nobody cares. If someone asks about it, I give them what I believe. I don't want them to take my words as truth, but I hope that it makes them researc
5.
by tuesdaynight 7d ago
You are trying to decode their answers as rational, but they are being just as emotional as the doomers people. Rationalization of emotional responses are very common in tech. They will say that GPT Sol does not work for X, which will proba
6.
by tuesdaynight 13d ago
Even if that is the case, the current models are already revolutionary. We would spend years discovering all the capabilities of these things. And that is considering that the plateau would last for years. And I didn't say that nobody
7.
by tuesdaynight 13d ago
In my useless opinion, most people are not aware of how big AI is and how bigger it will be in 3~5 years. It's not worthy to be worried about it, because it will be a global problem, but there are people who are completely blind about
8.
by tuesdaynight 14d ago
I'm sorry if I made it sound like I was accusing you of something. My comment was about the AI overview result. It didn't explain what is the reference, just giving what I said in the previous comment. I was confused until I hover
9.
by tuesdaynight 14d ago
Not necessarily related with the subject, but I was not aware of the patriots reference. So I decided to search on Google about it, and the AI overview was "Yes, they are behind everything, from the military to the economy", with
10.
by tuesdaynight 14d ago
I'm not saying that you should jump on the apocalypse wagon, but you need to remember that some people NEVER concede. You can see that in politics. Something unacceptable is done every day until it becomes the normal. So a model hackin
11.
by tuesdaynight 15d ago
I don't think that it will happen in the next decades, but adults cannot imagine a world where humans are not required for most (if not all) jobs. I say adults because kids kind of live in that world if they don't live in a very p
12.
by tuesdaynight 16d ago
Didn't OpenAI hire him? I thought it was not a secret that OpenClaw was the biggest influence.
13.
by tuesdaynight 16d ago
Have you tried talking to people in real life? At least most people here have some knowledge about it. In real life, nobody cares. I understood that 5 years ago, and now I act accordingly
14.
by tuesdaynight 19d ago
Same. I was in the doom AI crowd ~2 years ago, then I realized how many problems could be mitigated or solved by having these local models, and I became part of the cautiously excited crowd
15.
by tuesdaynight 19d ago
I don't think that this is about climate change only. 24 hours news cycle created this constant anxiety, that was overly exacerbated by social media. I stopped following news some years ago and it's eye-opening how most crisis are
16.
by tuesdaynight 19d ago
If there's a game that can push higher prices, it's GTA VI. I'm not a fan of the last game, but I never expected a game to be one of the most anticipated entertainment products ever
17.
by tuesdaynight 19d ago
Where people got this billions cost from? I doubt that they spent that much in GTA VI. RDR2 gave the base for GTA VI (engine and things like that), so I just find really odd they would spend 2 billions on the rest
18.
by tuesdaynight 20d ago
I'm not sure if they agree with you that is not a good solution, though. I don't even consider it a solution the same way that I don't consider slavery a solution for lack of workers.
19.
by tuesdaynight 20d ago
I know what some X users say about that, and I know that some people here have these same ideas. I was just wondering if that is the supposed solution that the person suggested
20.
by tuesdaynight 20d ago
But isn't that supposed to happen when you create a hit product? I imagine some people said similar things about Apple when iPhone started selling like water, but I don't think that it was the majority like here
21.
by tuesdaynight 20d ago
Okay, so I imagine they must agree that age verification is good as well
22.
by tuesdaynight 20d ago
I want to know if that is the proposed solution or if we finally found some libertarian idea that I'm unknown about
23.
by tuesdaynight 20d ago
I don't get why people say Nvidia is a bubble. They are selling products now, not in the future! If AI market collapses (I doubt it will happen), they will still be selling GPUs. They will make less money, but that is expected
24.
by tuesdaynight 20d ago
I don't care about US immigration, but remember that people don't want to have more children. There's nothing related with costs or whatever. Norway have a lot of incentives and people still prefer to have less kids than USA.
25.
by tuesdaynight 20d ago
Are you saying that they should be regulated or controlled by the government in some ways?
26.
by tuesdaynight 20d ago
So tell us what it takes, I'm curious
27.
by tuesdaynight 20d ago
"Remember that you could be wrong" They tried to show that you could be wrong, and you still say that it's suspicious because you don't want to be wrong about the guy selling his supposed real estate. I have no horse in
28.
by tuesdaynight 21d ago
You are right about perceived risks vs real risks. Nothing new for me, but it went over my head when talking about terrorism and drones. It makes total sense, thank you.
29.
by tuesdaynight 21d ago
It's frustrating, but we need to accept that we are not the kind of user that these platforms want. I stopped using Reddit for the same reason, and I accepted that I'm not the best user for them. For my luck, Reddit is not used as
30.
by tuesdaynight 21d ago
People would be uncomfortable if the truth about how much influence nation-states have in the online discourse nowadays was really exposed. I don't mean only bots, but how many political influencers are receiving money from adversaries

More ›