ttscoff

7 ms·

1.
by ttscoff 9mo ago
Things like Kramdown IALs, for example. Apex can handle a lot of (but not all) of Pandoc's special syntax, including cite-proc and bibliography support, but using Pandoc means you don't get features from Kramdown or mmark. Pandoc
2.
by ttscoff 9mo ago
Yeah, that's how I felt about CommonMark, too (but I've come around). The thing I'm shooting for is not a new standard, it's a tool that implements all of the existing "standards." I'm not creating new syn
3.
by ttscoff 9mo ago
It definitely is not. nvUltra is mostly out of my hands right now, my own projects (including Marked 3) are what I'm doing while waiting for the last pieces to come together.
4.
by ttscoff 11y ago
Fair enough :).
5.
by ttscoff 11y ago
I do a couple of podcasts, and one of them (Systematic) regularly interviews people who aren't terribly technical. I use Ecamm Call Recorder with Skype, and even when the remote interviewee is not prepared to record, I can get both sid
6.
by ttscoff 11y ago
For the record (from the author), 98% of my traffic is from Mac users, so I don't usually specify. I do, however, state in the second paragraph that it's very specific to ScreenFlow.
7.
by ttscoff 13y ago
By the way, I've always thought ActoTracker had potential but I haven't locked into it yet: http://freecode.com/projects/actotracker
8.
by ttscoff 13y ago
That is a seriously good idea, love it. I made doing because I get manic and don't even realize I'm switching to a new task until I've already forgotten what I was doing before. It's probably not an issue for most people
9.
by ttscoff 13y ago
You use TaskPaper or a text editor. Doing isn't designed for full management, just a fast way to log.
10.
by ttscoff 14y ago
Pretty sure it says iOS Text Editor roundup. Syntax highlighting is in there, other code-specific features are listed under additional features because there's really only two "code" editors in the mix.