tslathro

5 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by tslathro 5y ago

   The data comes from morningstar, and the adjusted data removed Musk's shares. To perform that calculation they just have total numbers of votes cast. (And I would guess that most shareholders vote by proxy, meaning individual sharehold
2. 2.▲
   by tslathro 5y ago

   Several reviews have produced output that shows, yes, diversity increases financial results. A summary of such reviews is here: https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbesinsights/2020/01/15/diver... Use th
3. 3.▲
   by tslathro 5y ago

   That's exactly my point. Some shareholders vote with criteria other than "cars sold" in mind. I regularly vote to improve worker quality of life, even if it means weaker financials for the company in stock votes.
4. 4.▲
   by tslathro 5y ago

   Speaking from experience of owning a model s, Tesla vehicles are not particularly high quality. Pleasant to drive, yes, but not particularly well built. I wonder if shareholders are trying to shore up long term concerns/risks they see
5. 5.▲
   by tslathro 5y ago

   Maybe the people voting care about the issues raised in the votes? Eg, use of arbitration against employees might be something someone genuinely cares about, independent of the impact to the stock price
6. 6.▲
   by tslathro 5y ago

   Just? If special interest groups control 60+% of shares outside of Musk's personal stake, I'd be shocked. The data argues against your hypothesis pretty convincingly.