trolly

7 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by trolly 10y ago

   Alt text says: "Contestants in the 2006 Google Global Code Jam stare at their computer screens at Google's New York office Friday, Oct. 27, 2006. One hundred of the best computer coders from around the world compete for prize mone
2. 2.▲
   by trolly 10y ago

   Security fixes?
3. 3.▲
   by trolly 10y ago

   "and is therefore working against the public interest."
4. 4.▲
   by trolly 10y ago

   We may be using the word "representing" differently. I took it to mean "those 9% are statistically representative of the majority of americans views/choices/opinions/desires/whatever". Where as it see
5. 5.▲
   by trolly 10y ago

   Considering both nominees have the highest disapproval rates I would say your statement is almost certainly incorrect. If anything, these 9% are representing a fundamental flaw in our first past the post system.
6. 6.▲
   by trolly 10y ago

   This sophomoric understanding and attitude is mind boggling. So your argument is "...but guys why would we want a utility to be treated like a utility!?" You're entire premise is based around the idea that this regulation is
7. 7.▲
   by trolly 10y ago

   Screw that. I'm not paying for an article before I even know whether it's hacky garbage or actual journalism. As if the temptation for these sites to pump out clickbait isn't bad enough as it is.... Unless you mean a complete
8. 8.▲
   by trolly 10y ago

   It seems that he was arguing against the sentiment rather than the statement
9. 9.▲
   by trolly 10y ago

   Out of curiosity could you give a couple examples?