transactional

5 ms·

1.
by transactional 5mo ago
I strongly hope that the authors are actually using O_DSYNC|O_DIRECT, and not just the O_DIRECT they discuss. The post seems to conflate the 4KB atomicity (support for which is still hit or miss from drives I’ve checked) with 4KB writes be
2.
by transactional 1y ago
percona/sysbench-tpcc has been subsequently updated to include a stronger disclaimer that it's "TPC-C-like" and doesn't comply with multiple TPC-C requirements. Fingers crossed that this helps stop vendors from doi
3.
by transactional 1y ago
...but are they enforceable?
4.
by transactional 1y ago
(Hi! Post author here.) It is written with a lean towards serializable, partly because there's a wide variety of easy examples to pull which all implement serializable, but the ideas mostly extend to non-serializable as well. Non-seria
5.
by transactional 2y ago
I'll rephrase the line sometime, but the intention is to communicate that it's the default choice to go with if you're making this decision in 2024. Most of the projects which aren't using some form of direct IO are doi
6.
by transactional 3y ago
A recent blog post about MongoDB's SBE detailed that the purpose behind their VM is that it serves as a way to re-use an execution component between two different query languages. SQLite's claim was just that the strong separatio
7.
by transactional 3y ago
It’s interesting to me that in the original proposal for fixing fsync to actually be durable ( https://lwn.net/Articles/270891/ ), there was thought given to the desire for a non-flushing write barrier (ctrl-f SYNC_
8.
by transactional 4y ago
There's one set of folk working on a btree, and another set of folk are now working on a RocksDB storage engine. The original preference away from RocksDB was that it doesn't play well with deterministic simulation. Any code incl
9.
by transactional 5y ago
If you don’t like being told what to do, boy do I have bad news about PhDs for you...
10.
by transactional 5y ago
(Disclaimer: affiliated) Redwood isn't "completed", but it's not unavailable. Evaluating it via `fdbcli> configure ssd-redwood-1-experimental ` is encouraged, but it hasn't seen sufficiently deep evaluation and
11.
by transactional 5y ago
I understand nothing of helm, but https://github.com/FoundationDB/fdb-kubernetes-operator/pull... seems to suggest yes?