tp3358

7 ms·

1.
by tp3358 7d ago
But you'll use the mediocre software written by hundreds of mediocre devs, and a team that doesn't fully understand the whole codebase due it's ever-inflated technical debt? I get the angst of AI coding, but it is funny that
2.
by tp3358 1mo ago
I guess context clues and the way the post was written had obvious implications - that was my point. I do understand it leaves a little open to interpretation, which is the angle he decided to comment on.
3.
by tp3358 1mo ago
Isn't this somewhat semantical? Boring implies a lot of the things you said, especially if it means your team's experience is largely pooled in a particular dev environment. Assuming most boring tech is ubiquitous, it's pro
4.
by tp3358 1mo ago
Example of startups/incumbents that are using AI to reinforce workflows? I am assuming you don't read up on this stuff much, but it's everywhere. I can give you multiple examples in my industry (logistics) that are actively
5.
by tp3358 1mo ago
Is it long term pain if a small startup in a very competitive vertical gets to market quicker with code gen and finds market fit? Whether that results in a rewrite or a refactor, that is still a huge win and one that a lot of people will g
6.
by tp3358 1mo ago
Yeah, this is the way. I assumed that was fairly standard at this point.
7.
by tp3358 2mo ago
But if the code base is constructed in a way which results in strong test suites (human driven), quality evals, robust documentation, and modular implementation, will the human really lose that much context? Given that those things are chec
8.
by tp3358 2mo ago
This is cope.
9.
by tp3358 2mo ago
Maybe this is an elementary angle given my lack of security experience, but couldn't Microsoft figure out a wat to parse the documents prior to model analysis/action? Implement some form of deterministic layer that resides betwee