Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
tordrt
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
1.
▲
by
tordrt
2mo ago
An "agent orchestrator" (or whatever you want to call it) that supports any cli agent. Trying to optimize for reducing cognitive load for working on different tasks at the same time with agents. Currently doing final polishes on a
2.
▲
by
tordrt
4mo ago
You are talking as if oil and gas delayed the future, which I dont think makes sense at all. I think we are underestimating all the derivatives we use from oil and gas here. I think this is all very optimistic. I think not having oil and ga
3.
▲
by
tordrt
4mo ago
Yeah, my point was that it would have been even worse without oil and gas. solar, wind and semiconductors all require a very advanced petrochemical supply chain. You simply couldn't produce any of this without products derived from oil
4.
▲
by
tordrt
4mo ago
I dont think this makes sense, given how insanely much more polluting coal is. You have to burn massive amounts of coal to power the liquid refinery, 50% of the energy lost essentially in the conversion process. In addition to that liquid c
5.
▲
by
tordrt
4mo ago
Man, come on.. There are even at least two comments from people in this thread arguing this exact point. Ill promise you its frequency is even higher in the real world than on HN. You must not be very much exposed to the environmental movem
6.
▲
by
tordrt
4mo ago
The Industrial Revolution started in 1760-1800 and was driven by coal, completely replacing wood as the primary industrial fuel. We almost exterminated whales and deforested the entirety of Europe before discovering fossil fuels, which both
7.
▲
by
tordrt
4mo ago
How would we do the whole industrial revolution thing on whale oil and lumber? Whales would most certainly be extinct by now, thats for sure. 100 years later is an immense amount of extra human suffering, not to say that reaching current le
8.
▲
by
tordrt
4mo ago
I think a lot of people actually dont realize the value it gives humanity. Lots of people think we would have been better of in an alternate universe where we never discovered oil & gas. How is this short therm value for people using th
9.
▲
by
tordrt
4mo ago
I think Europe happily buys from the Gulf currently, and reluctantly buys from Russia if they have to. Its more about being self sufficient. This is something that can easily be weaponized against us. E.g. Russia using Europes own money to
10.
▲
by
tordrt
4mo ago
How much extra investment to you think green tech companies get for pension funds excluding investment in this sector? They also only invest in publicly listed companies, not green startups. To me it seems like the exclusion is based on the
11.
▲
by
tordrt
4mo ago
I think the right way to go about this is to tax consumption. The most efficient one would just be a co2 tax, to not favoritize some emission over others. This is mostly fine in western rich countries, and we already do this to some extent
12.
▲
by
tordrt
4mo ago
The second most expensive source of energy is misleading in terms of whole picture. They are using a theoretical cost per kwh generated. You have to account for the much higher infrastructure and systemic cost of electricity generation you
13.
▲
by
tordrt
4mo ago
Slavery is evil. Fossil fuels is actually still a net good for humanity. E.g. the consequences of removing access to these energy sources, would be overwhelmingly more negative for humanity right now, than the consequence of global warming.
14.
▲
by
tordrt
4mo ago
The fossil fuel part doesn't seem like a rational decision to me. Why are we pretending that fossil fuels dont provide an immense amount of value for humanity, and that its horrible to invest or support building out any fossil fuel pro
15.
▲
by
tordrt
4mo ago
Baton ( https://getbaton.dev ) A simple organized desktop "IDE" for running lots isolated parallel coding agents without having your brain exploding. That was at least what I was trying to do when I started. Its freemium
16.
▲
by
tordrt
5mo ago
Which countries do this for a good reason? I dont think there is a single western country that does this.
17.
▲
by
tordrt
6mo ago
I appreciate the feedback!
18.
▲
by
tordrt
6mo ago
You can open a directory also as a workspace, it just wont have git stats and git shortcuts.
19.
▲
by
tordrt
6mo ago
200 dollars a month goes a long way with claude code
20.
▲
by
tordrt
6mo ago
Appreciate the feedback! Looking into it
21.
▲
by
tordrt
6mo ago
I have tried to provide after best ability, but have only been testing them on vm's on my mac! So be aware. I labeled them Beta due to this. But most features should work fine, probably better on linux than windows.
22.
▲
by
tordrt
6mo ago
The underlying git worktree still lives on your disk until you delete it. So its not harder than starting a terminal with claude --continue, or codex resume --last inside the git worktree, depending on what agent the user used.
23.
▲
by
tordrt
6mo ago
The main difference is that Baton is agent-agnostic and terminal-native. It doesn't add a GUI on top of Claude Code or Codex, it builds around the terminal itself, so you run whatever agent CLI you want natively, but with convenient sh
24.
▲
Show HN: Baton – A desktop app for developing with AI agents
(getbaton.dev)
62 points
by
tordrt
6mo ago
|
52 comments
25.
▲
by
tordrt
7mo ago
Where would any of your hate speech examples actually be illegal?
26.
▲
by
tordrt
8mo ago
Of course they can perform more than one task at the time, the question is why have they started prioritizing Minnesota? Which dont have a lot of illegal immigrants. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/2000-feder
27.
▲
by
tordrt
9mo ago
The US doesn't stand alone either? It's impossible to stand alone and still have access to all top tech in todays world. US will obviously rely much more on china without EU trade. EU is currently dependent on US for software/
28.
▲
by
tordrt
9mo ago
It's not discussing wanting Greenland that is wrong, its threatening an ally about it through media instead of going about it in a diplomatic and friendly way. The motives also don't seem rational at all, but more about boosting T
29.
▲
by
tordrt
9mo ago
The US are already free to have bases on Greenland. In fact the US has closed dozens of bases on Greenland since the 40s.
30.
▲
by
tordrt
9mo ago
How is this click bait and rage bait? I think the article is quite reasonably telling the events leading up to and the response from Denmark. The president says Greenland needs to be a part of the US, and he wont rule out using military for
More ›