torbid

6 ms·

1.
by torbid 1y ago
Right and this is what I am saying is backwards with the protocol. It is not in anyone's best interest that some random 3rd party takes responsibility to preserve data for CAs indefinitely to prove things. The CA should identify where
2.
by torbid 1y ago
If CAs have to share CTs and have to save everything the CT would save to their last submission then no CA can destroy the log without colluding with other CAs. (I.e. your log ends abruptly but polling any other CA that published to the sam
3.
by torbid 1y ago
I understand that. But.. If 12 CAs send to the same log and all have to save up to their latest entry not to be declared incompetent to be CAs, how would all 12 possibly do a worse job of providing that log on demand than a random 3rd party
4.
by torbid 1y ago
These sound like good improvements but I still don't really get why the ct log server is responsible for storage at all (as a 3rd party entity).. Couldn't it just be responsible for its own key and signing incremental advances to
5.
by torbid 1y ago
Huh? I don't think the SEC would (just) apologize for letting you get away with manipulation of a significant portion of the US index funds just because they should have noticed you sooner.
6.
by torbid 1y ago
They tried this before with fruit. The US companies just sold their interest in production and have plenty of other options for acquisition if they try to tax beyond the relative ease of South America verse anywhere else in the global south
7.
by torbid 1y ago
Sure, but have you ever seen a pet parrot with the person it bonded to? I've had cats that were affectionate and cats that came to the house only for food. The overall problem with this study is that it does nothing to try to categoriz
8.
by torbid 1y ago
I don't see why bird ownership wasn't similar to cat.. Would mammal be important or would there be a hidden variable in being able to house a dog or cat as one sometimes needs less permissions for smaller animals in rental agreeme
9.
by torbid 1y ago
I guess that's a question of whether you like the musician or the music. In the arc of the song, the boyfriend clearly developed good taste.
10.
by torbid 1y ago
Yes, though 70% is a normal cut-off, I think most versions more heavily bias the placement towards 1/2 in the past square instead of the 1/9th of real chance. Without the bias it is simpler to always guess no.
11.
by torbid 1y ago
It seems to me like the goal is to work around the user having to type that to use Bcachefs while implying that they will have with the standard gatekeepers to avoid any limits on adoption via quality checks.
12.
by torbid 1y ago
It doesn't work at all, Potter Stewart wasn't stupid or uninformed about what a secular republic is, so he was acting in bad faith to push for personal discretion definitions that will mostly be performed by people in the majority
13.
by torbid 1y ago
If the goal is to hoard a currency itself instead of use it as the exchange between real investments then this makes perfect sense, but those people shouldn't be upset when we tell them we don't directly accept their "currenc