topaz0

4 ms·

1.
by topaz0 4d ago
Uh oh, did it ruin your perfect GPA??
2.
by topaz0 5d ago
I forgive you I guess
3.
by topaz0 5d ago
- facilitate the infinite scroll - remind you that the phone is in your pocket, to initiate the infinite scroll
4.
by topaz0 5d ago
I wonder if Meta pays phone manufacturers under the table to keep their size large
5.
by topaz0 5d ago
Swapfiles are fixed size just like swap partitions. They do not grow and shrink arbitrarily as you swap more/less.
6.
by topaz0 7d ago
That was the net effect (assuming what they solved was the actual problem and not a loophole in the problem statement or a lean bug). My point is they need not all work coherently to do that -- for example, for all we know 3/4 of them
7.
by topaz0 8d ago
What makes you think they were coherent?
8.
by topaz0 10d ago
I've had (computer-related) rsi off and on for the last few years too, do not recommend
9.
by topaz0 10d ago
Iteration and recursion are famously equivalent
10.
by topaz0 17d ago
Unfortunately we won't get a chance to see whether kagi could make it work before SEO was a thing, so this isn't a fair comparison. (Not defending kagi necessarily, I've never tried it, no opinion on how it fares on today&#x2
11.
by topaz0 21d ago
Eh, just have a human evaluate and approve every tool call
12.
by topaz0 21d ago
> nobody Speaking for yourself I guess
13.
by topaz0 21d ago
Generational wealth is just wealth that survives to the next generation. It doesn't have to be extravagant wealth when it gets there to count. Also wealth does not start at the ability to live an extravagant life without a salary... Yo
14.
by topaz0 21d ago
Says who? Ive never heard this and can't find anyone saying this.
15.
by topaz0 21d ago
A house you own outright is already generational wealth
16.
by topaz0 27d ago
I don't think it's about giving credit at all.
17.
by topaz0 27d ago
We absolutely have digital machines with digital controls, they're called computers, and the controls are called programming languages etc. The reason people prefer llms over programming is exactly because it lets them specify their pr
18.
by topaz0 29d ago
Lol
19.
by topaz0 29d ago
As long as you're the kind of person the car rental people tend to approve of...
20.
by topaz0 1mo ago
It's written as if the UV and infrared are scattering the blue, which is not correct. Everything scatters off small particles, but shorter (blue) wavelengths scatter more (as the 6th power of the frequency), so most of the scattered li
21.
by topaz0 1mo ago
Wood bending is way older than the nr 14. Plenty of that stuff in 18th c. Europe but apparently it was a common technique in lots of cultures before they had any contact with europeans too, going way back.
22.
by topaz0 2mo ago
Interesting point I guess, much to consider
23.
by topaz0 2mo ago
To be clear, I am not agreeing that people only upvote their favorite billionaires, just that if this particular thing was done by a Chinese model it would not have gotten the same attention
24.
by topaz0 2mo ago
Yeah
25.
by topaz0 2mo ago
Log odds ratios are less misleading. Or at least odds ratios.
26.
by topaz0 3mo ago
Road safety is a social good -- it depends on the cooperation of everyone on the road. Choosing to put down your phone or slowing down make everyone safer, including you. Choosing a bigger car makes everyone less safe except you, who get ma
27.
by topaz0 3mo ago
Appreciating that there are some benefits is differwnt from adhering to the church
28.
by topaz0 3mo ago
It's not a question of whether it's biased to say that, rather whether it would tend to bias the model's response (e.g. toward weighting the stated downsides as more imported than the implicit upsides). But that said, choosin
29.
by topaz0 3mo ago
The other issue is that it is going to depend very strongly on how you ask.
30.
by topaz0 3mo ago
It's an antisocial, even solipsistic way to do that. Offense evidently intended, even if you convince yourself it's not.

More ›