Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
toomanybits
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
1.
▲
Anthropic and Alignment (Ben Thompson)
(stratechery.com)
22 points
by
toomanybits
7mo ago
|
17 comments
2.
▲
by
toomanybits
5y ago
Now Kafka has ZK taken out and tiered storage coming in these factors are becoming mute points. With tiered storage Kafka has 2 layers and hence the benefits of broker/storage decoupling. By comparison, Pulsar has broker, bookkeeper,
3.
▲
by
toomanybits
5y ago
I think that's one of the main points. Now you can run it as a single process more like a traditional broker (although it's obviously still a log).
4.
▲
Kafka without ZooKeeper
(confluent.io)
393 points
by
toomanybits
5y ago
|
195 comments
5.
▲
The Rise of the Event Streaming Database
(thenewstack.io)
3 points
by
toomanybits
6y ago
|
0 comments
6.
▲
by
toomanybits
6y ago
I've heard of Comcast, but that's Yahoo. Not heard of the others.
7.
▲
by
toomanybits
6y ago
Being used by at least one company of significant size that (a) i've heard of and (b) isn't directly connected to the project would be a good start.
8.
▲
by
toomanybits
6y ago
You don't need a CS degree or Martin Kleppmann's book to work out it's a GPITA.
9.
▲
by
toomanybits
6y ago
I'm lost too. Kafka auto creates topics by default. Maybe you're referring to being able to create more topics? But that seems to be unproven. Kafka's limit is metadata and Pulsar is more metadata dependent than Kafka.
10.
▲
by
toomanybits
6y ago
> Pulsar will happily do with just 2x. This is just wrong. Pulsar provides weaker guarantees than Kafka. It's a quorum based system. If you run with two replicas Pulsar can't provide F-1 guarantees which Kafka can.
11.
▲
by
toomanybits
6y ago
Nope. It sucks. RIP.
12.
▲
by
toomanybits
6y ago
Show me one
13.
▲
by
toomanybits
6y ago
1. is true, but if you want that data to move to a new node, it still needs to be replicated. Kafka's approach is to use tiered storage (which I believe is close to completion). 2. Kafka can read from a replica node. It's relative
14.
▲
by
toomanybits
6y ago
This smacks of being heavily one-product-focussed to me. Being a Kafka user it's hard enough managing and understanding one system, nevermind three or four joined together. Maybe it's a bit faster or a bit more elastic, or whateve
15.
▲
by
toomanybits
8y ago
Are you sure? he seems to be using the past tense: "written so that software products like Landoop were free to embed our open source"
16.
▲
The Data Dichotomy: Rethinking the Way We Treat Data and Services
(confluent.io)
3 points
by
toomanybits
10y ago
|
0 comments
17.
▲
Hellerstein's Progressive Systems Project Ideas
(docs.google.com)
14 points
by
toomanybits
11y ago
|
1 comments
18.
▲
by
toomanybits
11y ago
there's a live stream of this talk happening now https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m-0cSdxiLLY#t=222
19.
▲
Here’s How They Built the Beastly Machines for Mad Max: Fury Road
(thecredits.org)
1 points
by
toomanybits
11y ago
|
0 comments
20.
▲
MongoDB v3.0 Storage Engine Shootout
(acmebenchmarking.com)
1 points
by
toomanybits
12y ago
|
0 comments