tooltitude

6 ms·

1.
by tooltitude 3y ago
We work on a GoLang productivity extension for Visual Studio Code ( https://www.tooltitude.com/ ). We are growing, but not as fast as we wish we did.
2.
Show HN: Tooltitude for Go – productivity extension for Golang for VS Code(tooltitude.com)
1 points by tooltitude 3y ago|0 comments
3.
Show HN: High end productivity features for GoLang in VS Code(accounts.google.com)
1 points by tooltitude 3y ago|0 comments
4.
Ask HN: Open-Source Legal Documents
3 points by tooltitude 4y ago|0 comments
5.
by tooltitude 4y ago
Our self hosted workers don't work. My understanding is that the control center is on the github side.
6.
by tooltitude 4y ago
You actually could do a lot of stuff in VS Code. See rust-analyzer or our extension: https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=tooltitu...
7.
Show HN: VS Code GoLang Productivity Extension(marketplace.visualstudio.com)
3 points by tooltitude 4y ago|0 comments
8.
by tooltitude 4y ago
I think it's not even downturn. I would call it rebalancing.
9.
by tooltitude 4y ago
>But, they often still pay far better than just about any other career you can do. Yep, that's completely true. >I'm a fairly unremarkable developer who works for a no-name tech company, but still make twice as much as my fr
10.
by tooltitude 4y ago
For me it's iPad Air.
11.
by tooltitude 4y ago
There are still a lot of SWE jobs which aren't filled. They just don't pay as well as the many eliminated jobs from the news.
12.
by tooltitude 4y ago
I found the books about Apple technologies by this collective to be very good: https://www.objc.io/
13.
by tooltitude 4y ago
See the chapter 14 called incorporating as non-profit. He mentions a case where Gaim (a messenger software) developers were sued by AOL.
14.
by tooltitude 4y ago
As far as I remember, the author of this book: https://www.amazon.com/Intellectual-Property-Open-Source-Pro... Recommended a scheme to shield OSS developers from liability. I am not a lawyer, so it looked a bit overly cauti
15.
by tooltitude 4y ago
So do you mean that limited liability clauses essentially void? This looks really absurd. How could we develop and distribute any software in such a context?
16.
by tooltitude 4y ago
We have been working on a VS Code extension (link in my profile), which released some time ago. I had a thought that may be we should stick with the approach used by most of the ecosystem, when license is linked from the extension page. How
17.
by tooltitude 4y ago
Almost all players in this field publish their work. If need arises we will be able to reproduce them, but only large company will be able to run the models cost efficiently, and there're a lot of scale effects here.
18.
by tooltitude 4y ago
This is very good news for us as consumers. We don't want anyone of the players to dominate this field, and we want the service to be as cheap as possible, ideally free.
19.
by tooltitude 4y ago
It's very useful for enterprises to have one solution like github. Github isn't the best in every fields, but overall it's the best offer (they have git hosting, continuous integration, bug tracking, discussion forums, hosted
20.
by tooltitude 4y ago
That's very good :) You might mention it on the site, since many people will have the same question.
21.
by tooltitude 4y ago
But will it be enough for you to maintain the system long term? For people who potentially could use your service this is very important.
22.
by tooltitude 4y ago
vscode recently introduced a similar feature. It stores a pretty large number of versions of every file without direct commit to SCM.
23.
by tooltitude 4y ago
Because it's too complicated for many users.
24.
by tooltitude 4y ago
The question is how do you make money or plan to make money? Payment processing would cost money anyway not from you but from the bank.
25.
by tooltitude 4y ago
AI is a subset of ML. For example, SVMs, Logistic Regression, and Decision Trees are ML but not AI.
26.
Ask HN: Free to Change/Use Privacy Policies
1 points by tooltitude 4y ago|0 comments
27.
by tooltitude 4y ago
It's a pedagogic paper, not scientific paper. People who invent things, and people who teach the things so that they become main stream often are very different kinds of people.
28.
by tooltitude 4y ago
It's part of the puzzle. You could also mention Schmidhuber who claimed that he invented attention a long time ago (didn't read his paper though, so hard to judge).
29.
by tooltitude 4y ago
I would say that BERT was an incremental improvement (as well as many others). But the idea of much more efficient sequence processing was introduced in this exact paper.
30.
by tooltitude 4y ago
The main contribution of this paper is that the authors found a very computationally efficient way to process sequence data. That was a real breakthrough. The previous approaches, like LSTM, GRE, etc were also working well on sequence data,

More ›