Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
tomlockwood
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
1.
▲
by
tomlockwood
17d ago
"It broke out of containment and hacked computers on its own!!!" Marketing.
2.
▲
by
tomlockwood
17d ago
The post sounds like an advertisement.
3.
▲
by
tomlockwood
27d ago
I'd estimate based on those it cost at least a million bucks.
4.
▲
by
tomlockwood
27d ago
We're never going to know how much it cost and how many hours of engineering time it took behind the scenes.
5.
▲
by
tomlockwood
28d ago
I believe this about as much as the claim that the Bun rewrite cost $165k
6.
▲
by
tomlockwood
28d ago
Says who?
7.
▲
Bun: If you need a paragraph-long comment, the code is wrong
(github.com)
3 points
by
tomlockwood
1mo ago
|
1 comments
8.
▲
by
tomlockwood
1mo ago
Bun now has a rule for github actions to chastise robobun if it leaves a long comment: "If you need a paragraph-long comment to justify why the workaround is OK, the code is wrong — fix the code"
9.
▲
by
tomlockwood
2mo ago
Jarred from Bun is in this comment section saying the rewrite isn't finished yet. I therefore don't consider it a failure or a success. I'll be keen to see how much the CI cost though since that's a part of the cost of t
10.
▲
by
tomlockwood
2mo ago
"Let them eat cake!"
11.
▲
by
tomlockwood
2mo ago
Personally I think the cost does matter.
12.
▲
by
tomlockwood
2mo ago
Yeah if you want you can check out my github page to see some tool failures. Nobody is hyping those up, though.
13.
▲
by
tomlockwood
2mo ago
You've got my blessing. I think given how mistaken I am, it should be quite an engaging article.
14.
▲
by
tomlockwood
2mo ago
uv
15.
▲
by
tomlockwood
2mo ago
It isn't clear to me that the price is worth it.
16.
▲
by
tomlockwood
2mo ago
Author here: Exactly. I had a funny thought that Bun might add a release tag while I was still writing the article. In that case I'd still publish it, because the point is we still don't know the cost it took to get to a viable, w
17.
▲
by
tomlockwood
2mo ago
Please feel free to write an article that corrects my mistakes.
18.
▲
by
tomlockwood
2mo ago
I link to Jarred's writeup on bun.com, where you'll note he mentions that its being used on Prisma and Claude Code. I don't agree that using something in a very specific environment is the same as a wide release. I trust read
19.
▲
by
tomlockwood
2mo ago
Author here: I don't need or want another Bun release or an NPM release or anything like that. Like I very clearly say in the article I just got chatting with a peer about the Bun rewrite and I decided to take a look. I'm consiste
20.
▲
by
tomlockwood
2mo ago
I mention Anthropic dogfooding this in the article.
21.
▲
by
tomlockwood
2mo ago
I don't think that's true. I think a fair chunk of them are places where Bun is handed a pointer by WebKit or something similar. I believe they write about this a little.
22.
▲
by
tomlockwood
2mo ago
From the article: > The goal of a postmortem is to draw meaningful conclusions to help you learn from your past successes and failures. Despite its grim-sounding name, a postmortem can be an extremely productive method of improving your
23.
▲
by
tomlockwood
2mo ago
I thought it was a fairly common turn of phrase! https://blog.codinghorror.com/the-project-postmortem/
24.
▲
by
tomlockwood
2mo ago
Ohhhhh for a world where that's peanuts for an open source project.
25.
▲
by
tomlockwood
2mo ago
That's absolutely correct!
26.
▲
by
tomlockwood
2mo ago
> I am none the wiser about how it's going. You and me both friend!
27.
▲
by
tomlockwood
2mo ago
More proof that it was written by a human!!!
28.
▲
by
tomlockwood
2mo ago
Author here: I'm also not sure how much we can glean from any of that!!! I look forward to Anthropic or Bun releasing a retrospective after their next release that fully outlines the cost.
29.
▲
by
tomlockwood
2mo ago
Not sure! I cludged together a counter using git log. I could go back and redo it but I think the number would serve my point either way.
30.
▲
by
tomlockwood
2mo ago
Author here: An apology on the graphs, they just count rust files touched in commits, not total commits. So if there were two commits and one touched 3 .rs files and another touched 2, it'd be counted as 5 for the purposes of the graph
More ›