Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
tomesch1982
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
1.
▲
by
tomesch1982
9mo ago
Clickbait. The opening paragraph contains some factual errors (you can only get kicked off a train when you do something illegal) and the whole story lives by exaggeration and missing facts. It is as moronic as saying people were kidnapped
2.
▲
by
tomesch1982
1y ago
Microsoft became miserably incompetent in IT in the 1980s. I'm saying this for decades now: If there is one thing that Microsoft is realy bad at then it's software. Almost every piece of software they produce is worse than the alt
3.
▲
by
tomesch1982
2y ago
What's more problematic is that Cloudflare is obviously reading and storing and analyzing passwords. So every service that uses Cloudflare on a login page is compromised. I bet that there are several Excel files with all scraped passwo
4.
▲
by
tomesch1982
5y ago
That was also my first thought.
5.
▲
by
tomesch1982
5y ago
Sounds a bit like survivor bias. People who have already recovered once (and not died) are more likely to recover a second time (and not die). In the control group, people who have never had the virus, some have a harder time with it. I hop
6.
▲
by
tomesch1982
7y ago
For example: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/36358265/when-does-git-r... This page has been viewed 230 thousand (!!) times. Because git is so easy and elegant that it lies to you what branches exist on the re
7.
▲
by
tomesch1982
7y ago
That is exactly the point. For git you need the ecosystem to cope with it's shortcomings and in addition some experts to help you out of the pickles this software gets you into. I mainly use fossil for personal projects. Whats nice abo
8.
▲
by
tomesch1982
7y ago
The branching in hg is actually way better than with git. The reason you are confused is probably because you learned the wrong (git) way of branches. If you want the wacky and unreliable git branching you can use hg bookmarks.
9.
▲
by
tomesch1982
7y ago
Git is neither easy not is it really elegant. It is useful for projects like Linux™ but for the vast majority of projects way better tools like mercurial or fossil would be a much better fit.
10.
▲
by
tomesch1982
7y ago
The git internals are good for some kinds of projects but for the actual majority of projects git is a very bad fit. Most people don't get that because they are blind for the much better tools like mercurial and fossil. The git UI/
11.
▲
by
tomesch1982
8y ago
Quote: The wonder of it all is not how Fossil can manage to construct a few kilobytes of HTML by using millions of CPU instructions, but that we’ve ended up in a world where we’re uncertain about whether millions of CPU instructions are suf
12.
▲
Why is Fossil so fast?
(mail-archive.com)
1 points
by
tomesch1982
8y ago
|
1 comments
13.
▲
by
tomesch1982
10y ago
That is exactly what I thought when I read the words "secure" and "trust". If it is not open source it is neither secure nor should anybody trust it. The word used in Britain to describe a statement like that is bollocks
14.
▲
by
tomesch1982
11y ago
Your logo looks like RoboVM [robovm.com].
15.
▲
by
tomesch1982
13y ago
Wow. They did never load their site in Firefox. There is at least one JS Error and some features of the site simply do not work. Neither in Africa nor in Europe.
16.
▲
by
tomesch1982
13y ago
This is oblivious a coincidence. I hope no one here would think with their right mind that there was any kind of intelligence behind that. It must have happened by chance.