tolerance

6 ms·

1.
Against Waldenponding (2018)(contraptions.venkateshrao.com)
2 points by tolerance 1d ago|0 comments
2.
by tolerance 3d ago
...which is to say that the current social condition belongs to the tail end of a continuum, the trajectory of which is less important to comprehend than the so-called " jetztzeit " is, which is supposedly incomprehensible itself?
3.
by tolerance 4d ago
What do you think this means?
4.
by tolerance 4d ago
Is there a Hacker News where there's submissions and talk about AI but it's just sort of like 7 guys in Chelsea boots while one of them doing Romanian dead lifts and squats off in the corner; the audio edition of The Origins of t
5.
You Are Not an Artisan (2013)(ribbonfarm.com)
1 points by tolerance 4d ago|1 comments
6.
Space Warfighting Environment 2040 [pdf](spacecom.mil)
6 points by tolerance 5d ago|0 comments
7.
by tolerance 6d ago
Right. But somewhere in between then and now the powers of the President expanded so that "the actual exercise of military force" in the name of defense ("preserving the freedom and independence of the United States and its
8.
by tolerance 6d ago
For evidence that Bluesky is a long-term living facility operating as a social media platform...look no further than how their users employ the word "skeet" to refer to "post".
9.
by tolerance 6d ago
I don't think that quote helps your case or detracts from the parent. Tangentially—and perhaps counterintuitively—it can be taken as an argument in favor of the name change. The statement also does little to address the ethical concer
10.
by tolerance 6d ago
Did you know that rivers contribute a significant portion to our atmosphere's moisture?
11.
by tolerance 6d ago
Nope! But I'm soaking all of this in and I appreciate these nudges. And after some thought I'm curious whether this means that LLMs ought to be adept at forming new metaphors as opposed to handling pre-existing ones.
12.
by tolerance 6d ago
I'm going to need a weekend or two to figure out what this means.
13.
by tolerance 6d ago
This may sound ignorant but it looks like ERSC intends to situate itself as a middle ground between tools that are supported by more general purpose protocols (i.e., Tangled and apparently, eventually, Forgejo) and tools that trying to main
14.
by tolerance 6d ago
This seems like a worthwhile listen. As it stands I think that LLMs sort of suck at this. Either that or I don't understand what analogous thinking is or people who use LLMs to facilitate this kind of thinking are bad at it too. But I
15.
by tolerance 6d ago
There's always hope for a Part II. Maybe on rhetoric; which is what I interpreted "The second most important thing" to be about. But the concepts introduced there are entirely new to me so I may be off.
16.
by tolerance 6d ago
> The structure of this post is a bit of a miss for me. Sorry about that. I wanted to write a short post about writing non-fiction but it turned out to be a bit longer than expected and I need to get to work now. I hope you enjoyed it. I
17.
by tolerance 6d ago
This is good blogging right here and sound advice for all writers on the web to follow. But I'm a little disappointed that one of those ink blot looking circles (preferably the big one on the left) did not lead back to the home page.
18.
by tolerance 9d ago
That's why I don't trust 'em neither!
19.
by tolerance 9d ago
Thank you for being able to point out and articulate these issues. LLMs have a habit of laundering pre-existing concepts per the interests (or input) of any given user.
20.
by tolerance 10d ago
What is the average person losing now on closed platforms? Think about why they should care about your answer and if there's any proof that it bothers them to the degree that they may view your alternative platforms as actual solutio
21.
by tolerance 10d ago
If I was someone who funded/relied on A/I's services I would have been trying to figure out what would it had taken for the US State Department to produce evidence for their allegations and would have lobbied for some sort of
22.
by tolerance 10d ago
Then do you think that the average person's disinterest in moving to different platforms is a bad thing? How does this affect the ideal version of the web it seems like you're advocating for?
23.
by tolerance 10d ago
What are incentives for the average person? Their logic seems straightforward: they want to be where their friends are at. And all they want to do there is cycle through their base emotions at a whim's pace. Whatever politics or techno
24.
by tolerance 10d ago
The idea that society was always going to be literate—as in a book-reading people—is sort of absurd, especially when the practice is treated like a means to an end and the medium of the book itself is rivaled by digital media that affects i
25.
by tolerance 11d ago
I've been trying to get people on HN to read this for the past two years but I think this is a good place to start for an answer. https://www.eurozine.com/blogging-the-nihilist-impulse/
26.
by tolerance 11d ago
Issues like this are proving the Horseshoe theory right.
27.
by tolerance 11d ago
That's not good.
28.
by tolerance 11d ago
Is this your first time reading The Economist?
29.
by tolerance 11d ago
> “Moral panic” is just an academic jargon term for “settle down peasants.” The irony of this that it portrays everything referred to as a moral panic as something worthy of legitimate worry and/or outrage that was brushed aside by
30.
by tolerance 11d ago
People refuse to let the concept of microblogs as conventional communications platforms die. Why?

More ›