tobyhinloopen

16 ms·

1.
by tobyhinloopen 3d ago
And don’t you dare changing it unless you like random bugs
2.
by tobyhinloopen 4d ago
Tnx!
3.
by tobyhinloopen 4d ago
No demo?
4.
by tobyhinloopen 4d ago
Worktrees or sandboxes. You can tell Claude to put its stuff in a worktree. I can easily develop any amount of features in the same codebase because they all run in their own worktree
5.
by tobyhinloopen 17d ago
You can have a camera doorbell using your copper wire. With a video doorbell you can get notifications when a person enters your property. You can notify police or neighbors if it’s a stranger
6.
by tobyhinloopen 2mo ago
Don't developers configure their LLM tools to only be able to access things the user using the LLM should have access to?
7.
by tobyhinloopen 3mo ago
Gotta love the LP4 mode. So much music on a single disk! Remember the cool rectangular batteries? Why aren't these gumstick batteries more used in modern devices!?
8.
by tobyhinloopen 3mo ago
I'll 100% try DuckDB in more serious projects where I would normally use Sqlite.
9.
by tobyhinloopen 3mo ago
The only reason I know and use DuckDB is because my (internal, private-use-only, experimental) vibe coded projects use it a ton. I didn't pick it - LLMs did. Until this article, I wasn't aware of what it actually is capable of. Mo
10.
by tobyhinloopen 3mo ago
Try the superpowers plugin, let it write a spec (what do you want?) and a plan (how is it implemented). Then let it implement the plan. Review each step as much as you care. These things take time so you can just do other stuff while it’s c
11.
by tobyhinloopen 3mo ago
You know what’s worse (less efficient) at parsing and writing code than LLMs? Humans.
12.
by tobyhinloopen 3mo ago
“This is a significant rewrite that will take weeks” Done after my potty break
13.
by tobyhinloopen 3mo ago
Try it on RAM and CPU. It’s slower but you can run them.
14.
by tobyhinloopen 3mo ago
That’s a great idea. Maybe use Claude Code with some owasp knowledge to sweep through them and see if there’s anything obvious?
15.
by tobyhinloopen 3mo ago
Because the air is squished out I suppose
16.
by tobyhinloopen 3mo ago
Min Release Age of 7-30 days covers the majority of potential issues with 0 effort. All major Node package managers should support it by now. Prom was the best IIRC, yarn second, but even npm is catching up
17.
by tobyhinloopen 3mo ago
I agree with this, It feels like a small upgrade like Opus 4.9 or something. It’s still pretty good though
18.
by tobyhinloopen 3mo ago
I’ve been doing pentesting with LLMs for a while and only hit a few “nope I won’t do that” and one “this conversation is flagged for being against the TOS”. No idea what the guardrails are but they are trivially abused
19.
by tobyhinloopen 3mo ago
Claude “respond in a friendly way that I agree with this comment”
20.
by tobyhinloopen 3mo ago
I actively support “my boss” to run Claude Code. I offered them to help and made jokes it’s so easy these days they might as well just call Claude Code themselves. I’ve shown I could plop in their documents of feedback and Claude fixed the
21.
by tobyhinloopen 3mo ago
I told something like “your value lies in reviewing the output yourself before sharing it, not in calling Claude. I can also use Claude.”
22.
by tobyhinloopen 3mo ago
You can order LLMs to use other patterns. I had an LLM recreate an app in a different stack with reasonable success
23.
by tobyhinloopen 3mo ago
You mean these tools you can now rebuild at the cost of a night and one Claude code subscription? You have to have an ordinarily unique startup if your software can’t be recreated quickly.
24.
by tobyhinloopen 3mo ago
That’s a bold claim to randomly write without any supporting sources
25.
by tobyhinloopen 3mo ago
Just as long as you speak a major language
26.
by tobyhinloopen 3mo ago
(A) I spent day and night using and making tools with and for LLMs. (B) As much as I humanly can.
27.
by tobyhinloopen 3mo ago
I think this is the first time I saw someone describe so clearly my concerns and experience with LLMs. I have little to add to it, except that I agree completely. Not sure what’s next
28.
by tobyhinloopen 3mo ago
I expected a “running for beginners” app hah, like for training / endurance
29.
by tobyhinloopen 3mo ago
Not sure yet. I’m monitoring it. However, it is totally viable for internal tools, rapid prototyping, experiments, etc. Frankly, there’s no faster or cheaper way to get such feature rich apps, and it was certainly better then what a cheap a
30.
by tobyhinloopen 3mo ago
It’s interesting though because the client’s dev team basically refused to look at it, dismissing it as insecure and such. I realized that the software he had made was actually better than what I would have made, because he understood the p

More ›