toastmaster11

13 ms·

1.
by toastmaster11 4mo ago
All that stuff you mentioned is derived from a core set of principles established by decades of software best practices applied to a new means of generating code. Like quite literally those instruction files/skills essentially just rei
2.
by toastmaster11 4mo ago
If the vibe coders are right I would give at least 90% of the credit to all the well made libraries, rules, and best practices that developers have built up over the decades. That’s what is embedded into LLMs and what might be the saving g
3.
by toastmaster11 4mo ago
I am GP, reading comprehension and such.
4.
by toastmaster11 4mo ago
Concurred
5.
by toastmaster11 4mo ago
How much pontificating needs to be done before people acknowledge nobody has any idea what to do with AI on an individual level? First being good developer and learning how to use AI was sufficient, next it was being able to design archite
6.
by toastmaster11 4mo ago
Profound political commentary?
7.
by toastmaster11 4mo ago
I find the most miraculous thing about 4.7 to be that the pelican is facing left, wonder why the right facing everything is so ubiquitous in these images.
8.
by toastmaster11 4mo ago
What happened that placed Opus 4.6 on max reasoning below Sonnet 4.6 on a lowered reasoning level?
9.
by toastmaster11 4mo ago
What exactly is the hard part they’re describing? Taste? Picking a stack? Noticing drift? Seems like the “harder and vaguer thing” would be explaining to someone why that’s even necessary, or why your particular taste or stack of choice are
10.
by toastmaster11 3y ago
I’m asking, why is it 4.5-turbo when 4.5 isn’t released yet?
11.
by toastmaster11 3y ago
But why would it be gpt-4.5-turbo, as opposed to just gpt-4.5? Are they just going to abandon past naming conventions? If they already had 4.5 and then did something else to make it “turbo” why not release 4.5 on the coattails of Gemini?
12.
by toastmaster11 3y ago
Another perspective, wouldn’t it be reasonable to believe that the faster a technology is developed, the faster it will reach its theoretical upper limit of improvement (assuming there is one)? To use your comparison as an example, mainfram
13.
by toastmaster11 3y ago
Sumplete is not an original game. Though points for an original name however. https://gizmodo.com/chatgpt-copy-sumplete-puzzle-game-summer...
14.
by toastmaster11 4y ago
Artificial intelligence creates a more compelling narrative. It’s the “us .vs. them” dynamic that humans are so fond of. Even when it isn’t an explicitly antagonistic relationship; an AI is still shown as an “other”. Really when you think a
15.
by toastmaster11 4y ago
I think the human need to feel useful, or to produce something is more sociological than a base human need. When/if that becomes an issue, if social rejection was not a consequence of not being productive more people would be okay with
16.
by toastmaster11 4y ago
I agree that is the ideal scenario, but what are the actual incentives for implementing A system like that?