Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
toado85
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
1.
▲
Since Jobs, Apple and Microsoft returns are nearly identical
(stockcomps.com)
2 points
by
toado85
6y ago
|
0 comments
2.
▲
Apple and Microsoft performance virtually tied since Jobs
(stockcomps.com)
4 points
by
toado85
6y ago
|
0 comments
3.
▲
Chipmakers' 10-year market dominance
(stockcomps.com)
1 points
by
toado85
6y ago
|
0 comments
4.
▲
An easy way to compare investment performance
(stockcomps.com)
1 points
by
toado85
6y ago
|
0 comments
5.
▲
If humans only died from 'flukes' (accidents, crime) we'd live 9,000ish years
(polstats.com)
2 points
by
toado85
10y ago
|
1 comments
6.
▲
Approval ratings for new presidents: trending downward?
(polstats.com)
1 points
by
toado85
10y ago
|
0 comments
7.
▲
by
toado85
10y ago
If you compare Trump to the S&P 500 over this time, he beats it if you don't account for dividends and loses to it if you do.
8.
▲
by
toado85
10y ago
I'm sure it would... problem is, it doesn't go back far enough: https://www.quandl.com/data/YAHOO/INDEX_SPY-SPDR-S-P-500-SPY
9.
▲
by
toado85
10y ago
S&P 500 change during this time: 122.74 - 2043.94 Total gain: 1565% Annual gain: 8.62% So without accounting for dividends (the S&P 500 price doesn't), Trump was about 1% better each year.
10.
▲
Trump's business growth compared to Apple, McDonald's
(stockchoker.com)
6 points
by
toado85
10y ago
|
10 comments
11.
▲
The tragic tale of SunEdison stock: a visualization
(stockchoker.com)
2 points
by
toado85
10y ago
|
0 comments
12.
▲
The iPwn: A 20-year Comparison of Apple, Microsoft and IBM
(stockchoker.com)
2 points
by
toado85
10y ago
|
0 comments
13.
▲
Apple, Microsoft and IBM growth: a 20-year comparison in 60 seconds
(stockchoker.com)
2 points
by
toado85
10y ago
|
0 comments
14.
▲
by
toado85
11y ago
Just updated to include dividends / dividend-reinvestment on by default. Thanks!
15.
▲
by
toado85
11y ago
Just added dividends / dividend reinvestment. This makes a huge difference if you go back in the 70s and earlier.
16.
▲
by
toado85
11y ago
Since so many people suggested it should include dividends and dividend reinvestment, I added that in, based on this chart: http://www.multpl.com/s-p-500-dividend-yield/table - as expected, it makes a huge difference i
17.
▲
by
toado85
11y ago
Found this - http://www.multpl.com/s-p-500-dividend-yield/table - which I'll use to add a "include-dividends" mode (on by default).
18.
▲
by
toado85
11y ago
That's technically what I'm using, however, if you look at the S&P 500 historic data - http://finance.yahoo.com/q/hp?s=%5EGSPC+Historical+Prices - the Adj. Close is the same as actual close (meaning there
19.
▲
by
toado85
11y ago
Ewww... never heard of that happening. I tested on iPad with Chrome / Safari / Firefox. Is this on iPhone? If so, which one?
20.
▲
by
toado85
11y ago
I'd love to use something like this or SPY or VFIAX rather than ^GSPC, but that's 38 fewer years of data available. I'll figure something out, though.
21.
▲
by
toado85
11y ago
Hey guys... I made the page. Just saw lots of traffic coming from here so figured I'd come check it out. A couple things I figured I should address after reading the comments: 1) Yahoo!'s historic S&P 500 data does not factor