tnzn

6 ms·

1.
by tnzn 3y ago
Never heard of it before and I live in Paris lol
2.
by tnzn 7y ago
Because this has to do with western medicine as a discipline and practice, in which we over-objectivized health care and the doctor/patient relationship is heavily asymetric. This leads to the fact that in most cases, doctors do not re
3.
by tnzn 7y ago
It can be re oppened https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/media/2017/...
4.
by tnzn 7y ago
I'm a supporter of equalty outcomes, versus equality of opportunity, and I don't believe we're "all equal" in the sense you make it look like. This is a strawman. I believe we should distribute ressources depending
5.
by tnzn 7y ago
There is still flaw in the reasoning though. Transitionning implies much more than just a change in hormone balance as you are aware. Plus emotionnal responses to subjective feelings and physiological cues are not free from social influence
6.
by tnzn 7y ago
Well, it is clearly stated that it's a methological error.
7.
by tnzn 7y ago
Copy url to sci hub, simple as that. Or contact one of the authors.
8.
by tnzn 7y ago
Anthropologists are careful to call for ethical decisions based on evolutionnary arguments.
9.
by tnzn 7y ago
If you're saying it in a conversation about wether or not we should allow non-white people to be in a country with low light, yeah. There is no objective, neutral statement.
10.
by tnzn 8y ago
>The author is almost making it seem like models are reality and that people think that. They're not and I don't think anyone has ever thought they were... that's where you're wrong. Way too many people, many of them
11.
by tnzn 8y ago
Because you don't recall the digits, you recall yourself learning these digits. While doing so, you experience, you have feelings, although weak.
12.
by tnzn 8y ago
When a scientific definition is too far away from the common definition, using the word in a headline becomes a problem
13.
by tnzn 8y ago
Seems like it. I upvoted when I read the begining, because I came to discuss the problem with the lack of critical stance towards criteria and metrics used to define how innovative a country is, so I thought it was about that, then I found
14.
by tnzn 8y ago
Except that's not what happens.
15.
by tnzn 8y ago
Well there's r/askscience and r/askhistorians which are similar on that matter.
16.
by tnzn 8y ago
Cant provide sources because I lost my written notes but Diamond's claims are often based off of cherry picking and iirc there are a lot of canibalistic societies which don't back this claim up. This is a hammer and nail issue. He
17.
by tnzn 8y ago
But do weather forecast always end with "but this could also be completely random" to avoid being accountable ?
18.
by tnzn 8y ago
Because stats show otherwise
19.
by tnzn 8y ago
This isn't the point though. There's not much communism, if at all, in China, at least in the original sense of communism.
20.
by tnzn 8y ago
It's been like that for like, 3 years, in France
21.
by tnzn 8y ago
Care to explain why you believe the "authors assumptions of what constitute environmental consciousness and threat to mascuilinity" was wrong ? Because the way they defined it seemed ok to me from what I remember. No matter the li
22.
by tnzn 8y ago
Yeah but the partisanship, or ideology in general for that matter, can basically be a core reason why people "want to believe" in X. Why would one "want to believe" in Muslim rape gangs other than to confirm previous bel
23.
by tnzn 8y ago
"Anybody who's capable of any degree of self reflection can also probably see the exact problem in themselves. " It has less to do with an ABILITY of self reflection than with a POSTURE to take in context. Look around you, yo
24.
by tnzn 8y ago
"Politically neutral" what ?
25.
by tnzn 8y ago
I've had to send dozens of resumes in 2 years but I guess the resume is ded because SV says so yep
26.
by tnzn 8y ago
>Socialism. It wasn't called socialism in those days, but that is what it was—unlimited government control and taxation of everything and everybody What ?! Seriously ? Taxes = sociamism ?
27.
by tnzn 8y ago
Not every employee in amazon is a well off techie.
28.
by tnzn 8y ago
BBC has most likely never been non partisan though. It's just the stance it used to take was too close to the so-called neutral one, which isn't actually neutral. No way to disagree about sensationnalism though.
29.
by tnzn 8y ago
I doubt the world would be a better place. Different languages often go hand in hand with different cultures, trying to unify everything may not be a good idea to make the world better.
30.
by tnzn 8y ago
It's hard making some people understand that such debates go beyond the scope of science (or that there's anything beyond the score of science for that matter) :/

More ›