tmelm

8 ms·

1.
by tmelm 1y ago
Incredibly cool. What a write-up. What an engineer.
2.
by tmelm 1y ago
Inspecting the source confirms your suspicions. My guess is 15 minutes.
3.
by tmelm 2y ago
What you're describing is my main concern of how this AI development might turn out. If we get any sort of autonomous agent (conscious or not) that can replace human workers in massive scale, there is currently no government or other i
4.
by tmelm 2y ago
He implied that Americans are not used walking places, no matter how short the distance.
5.
by tmelm 2y ago
I'm equally as confused; huge WTF moment. Seems like a paradigm breakthrough, in that Nobel Prizes can be given for discoveries in tangential fields. Or perhaps it's due to Dr. Hopfields physicist status, that all his discoveries
6.
by tmelm 2y ago
This makes sense to some extent (terminal illness or such), but one can argue as someone did above that if you're willing to make the permanent decision to "destroy" yourself, are you sane enough to legally make decision? Ar
7.
by tmelm 2y ago
Rough read. It's hard for me to even imagine such a state of mind, and the suffering one experiences. Somehow the fact that the euthanization takes place in your own home gives me the creeps. I really wonder what drives people to work
8.
by tmelm 2y ago
Honestly this is kind of a double edged sword. Allowing all drug use, and legalizing some form of registered and sanctioned trade of it might be better than what we have now, who knows. But at the same time, imagine large companies advertis
9.
by tmelm 3y ago
If Sam genuinely believed that AGI (assumption: capable of achieving some sort of singularity, or at least being capable enough to replace x% of human knowledge workers) would materialize in the near future, why would he then invest any tim