tirrit

5 ms·

1.
by tirrit 7y ago
Fair point. Thank you for pointing that out! Even though -I- have trouble understanding the "hacker" relevance, the people has spoken :) And you are right, my initial comment did not contribute in any relevant way - I can see that
2.
by tirrit 7y ago
Yes, and i lost my karma quicker than I can say, don't take it personal ;P But I guess emotions go wild with these things. I off course mean no offence, and hope they can save as much as possible within firefighter safety. Though I wou
3.
by tirrit 7y ago
This study seems very low value, to me. There are so many variables effecting these decisions. 1. Work activity I would never record music, with only one monitor, because I use many programs, which are synced, and have LOTS of buttons and
4.
by tirrit 8y ago
Has there ever been made an effort with any other approach/arrangement, in modern times? Any sources on this, anyone?
5.
by tirrit 8y ago
Ok, then I understand what you mean, and I agree with you. Most people are bad at hearing, in that context, for sure. Or rather, we who have decades of experience in this field, have over average capacity for processing music and the sounds
6.
by tirrit 8y ago
What do you mean, humans are bad at hearing? Most humans have great eardrums. Isn't hearing subjective, and dependent on the goal you are "hearing for"? What do you mean with golden ears? Do you mean perfect pitch? The abilit
7.
by tirrit 8y ago
I also got this with a few files, with only one instrument, and low velocity. Try some songs with more "action" :) Still, calling it new songs, is stretching it, in my opinion :P