Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
tinyspacewizard
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
1.
▲
by
tinyspacewizard
10mo ago
Start-ups should strongly consider F#. It's a force multiplier when you have a small team of strong developers.
2.
▲
by
tinyspacewizard
11mo ago
What should we use instead?
3.
▲
by
tinyspacewizard
11mo ago
> Why two cloud providers? Initially we used only DigitalOcean, but a data intensive SaaS like tap needs a lot of cloud resources and AWS have a generous $1,000 credit package for self-funded startups. So some Kubernetes experts migrated
4.
▲
by
tinyspacewizard
11mo ago
> Of course you can inspect it: open the source code you wrote and read it. Also, don't write the code you don't want to be executed? This is not what they meant by inspection . What they mean is that you can write a function,
5.
▲
by
tinyspacewizard
11mo ago
This seems like a cool article, but it isn't readable without Haskell background knowledge. > For an intuition why this is true, consider that the constant functor Const r has an Applicative instance whenever r is a monoid, because
6.
▲
by
tinyspacewizard
11mo ago
Weird feeling knowing that an ecommerce / wallet store has employees with more advanced programming knowledge than most financial institutions.
7.
▲
Tying the Knot
(wiki.haskell.org)
3 points
by
tinyspacewizard
11mo ago
|
0 comments
8.
▲
Zippers: Making Functional "Updates" Efficient (2010)
(goodmath.org)
63 points
by
tinyspacewizard
11mo ago
|
15 comments
9.
▲
by
tinyspacewizard
11mo ago
1. Wrapping is more code than using a built-in pipe operator 2. There is a run-time overhead to wrapping IMO a design goal of programming langauges should be for the most readable code to also be the most performant. Language features tend
10.
▲
by
tinyspacewizard
11mo ago
There is more than one proposal; the F#-style one doesn't have the (weird) placeholder syntax. > You can still make it work by adding it to the prototype This is exactly what we want to avoid!
11.
▲
by
tinyspacewizard
11mo ago
Pipes are great where you want to chain several operations together. Piping is very common in statically typed functional langauges, where there are lots of different types in play. Sequences are a common example. So this: xs.map(x =&
12.
▲
by
tinyspacewizard
11mo ago
Sad that the pipe operator proposal seems to have stalled. The F# version of the proposal was probably the simplest choice.
13.
▲
Why isn't differential dataflow more popular? (2021)
(scattered-thoughts.net)
2 points
by
tinyspacewizard
1y ago
|
0 comments
14.
▲
RelationalFactQA: A Benchmark for Evaluating Tabular Fact Retrieval from LLMs
(arxiv.org)
1 points
by
tinyspacewizard
1y ago
|
0 comments
15.
▲
by
tinyspacewizard
2y ago
Brexit made this far less likely - but perhaps people in France, Germany, Spain, etc. could do this.
16.
▲
by
tinyspacewizard
2y ago
Functional Programming hasn't even been tried for game development, really. There is a lack of overlap between the game dev industry and academia. The studios are (rightly) risk averse and try to use the same broad strategies to build
17.
▲
by
tinyspacewizard
2y ago
You should put this online somewhere!
18.
▲
Higher-kinded bounded polymorphism in OCaml (2021)
(okmij.org)
141 points
by
tinyspacewizard
2y ago
|
10 comments
19.
▲
The Moirai Programming Language
(github.com)
2 points
by
tinyspacewizard
2y ago
|
0 comments
20.
▲
by
tinyspacewizard
2y ago
Expect a wave of artists moving into education to make ends meet.
21.
▲
by
tinyspacewizard
2y ago
Also a bit scary to have a system without a scaling mechnism built-in in the path of customer traffic. At some point you may be racing to upgrade it.
22.
▲
by
tinyspacewizard
2y ago
Python is really bad at recursion (part of why it's not appropriate for functional programming), so perhaps an unfair benchmark? A Pythonic implementation would use loops and mutation.
23.
▲
by
tinyspacewizard
2y ago
I think what Meta is doing is really smart. We don't really know where AI will be useful in a business sense yet (the apps with users are losing money) but a good bet is that incumbent platforms stand to benefit the most once these use
24.
▲
by
tinyspacewizard
2y ago
Terraform is not really a competitor. Maybe Nomad is? I expect most K8s shops use a bit of Terraform, maybe Vault, etc.
25.
▲
by
tinyspacewizard
3y ago
Could easily be leverage in the negotiation.
26.
▲
by
tinyspacewizard
3y ago
Google support Kubernetes, so there's precedent there. I could see Microsoft keeping things open too. So far they have done OK with GitHub and NPM.
27.
▲
by
tinyspacewizard
3y ago
There should be a way to exclude seasons (e.g. Simpsons)
28.
▲
by
tinyspacewizard
3y ago
Like most public policy issues, a balance needs to be struck. Typical SUV trips could easily be done in a lighter vehicle or even no vehicle at all.
29.
▲
by
tinyspacewizard
3y ago
Article implies that free public transport lead to increases in car traffic. But we have to wonder, would it have been even worse without free public transport?
30.
▲
by
tinyspacewizard
3y ago
Excel single-handedly keeps VB alive; it has a huge amount of sway over what langauges people use and learn - so why settle for Python?
More ›