tinybrotosaurus

8 ms·

1.
by tinybrotosaurus 4y ago
Probably due to the ghost of Kiev.
2.
by tinybrotosaurus 4y ago
As long as hydrogen is (ignorantly) banned, airships will never make a comeback. LZ 127 Graf Zeppelin, using hydrogen as lifting gas, flew 1.7 million km safely. [1]. Built in the 20's, without polymers or hydrogen sensors or electroni
3.
by tinybrotosaurus 4y ago
What is worse, government censorship or digital censorship through big tech? Remember when all these corporations banned Trump at the same time? Imagine not being able to buy from Amazon when there is no retailer left. Imagine not being abl
4.
by tinybrotosaurus 4y ago
And what was the purpose of said law again? If i increase the price of cars by a 1000x, am i not deciding who gets to buy and then use one? I'm making it harder to buy cars with the intention of less people using it, just like carbon t
5.
by tinybrotosaurus 4y ago
And what exactly one exercises by doing that?
6.
by tinybrotosaurus 4y ago
There is only a small number of good mechanisms (such as the one you pointed out) in the world. In today's world this is a problem. People and groups of people need to bring something different to the "table" in order to get
7.
by tinybrotosaurus 4y ago
Could you show me the control stack source code to prove that? Ah yes, you can't.
8.
Magnetic Rivers(youtube.com)
2 points by tinybrotosaurus 4y ago|0 comments
9.
by tinybrotosaurus 4y ago
If the Ukrainian army uses GPS signals in military operations, does this constitute direct assistance by the US?
10.
by tinybrotosaurus 4y ago
Because they provide a service?
11.
by tinybrotosaurus 4y ago
It is a race to the bottom nevertheless. While on one side minimum wage is pushed higher, on the other technology gets cheaper. Eventually even burger flippers will find themselves out of a job.
12.
by tinybrotosaurus 4y ago
An elevator can be considered a purely mechanical, not-social thing. Traffic can have a social aspect to it, most of us do not really care and consider it too to be a not-social thing. My point was more about what happens when we take thing
13.
by tinybrotosaurus 5y ago
What is your opinion on the societal effects of this lack of trust? This default trust on computer systems undermine trust in other humans. How can we hope to live in a community we do not trust? Why would i take into consideration X opinio
14.
by tinybrotosaurus 5y ago
Conspiracy? Their point is compliance. Do what you are told without questioning it, be it government policy or corporate wish. People did nothing after 2008, they did nothing after proof of government mass surveillance, and they choose not
15.
by tinybrotosaurus 5y ago
Might as well package it as a snap.
16.
by tinybrotosaurus 5y ago
The downvotes are hilarious. If you've never been downvoted, you're not posting enough.