ting0

6 ms·

1.
by ting0 4mo ago
Do you think Prometheus + Grafana is the way to go?
2.
by ting0 4mo ago
This looks cool
3.
by ting0 5mo ago
It's not clear to me how or why this works, and how it compares to just using md files in my project. For something like this, we really need benchmarks.
4.
by ting0 5mo ago
Hey man, if it works it works. There's a reason everyone is creating AI tools. We're all buying them. I'm still waiting for someone to make a world-class cli harness that can replace Claude Code but solves the memory and desi
5.
by ting0 5mo ago
It's terrible, don't waste your time like I did. That bench means nothing by the way.
6.
by ting0 5mo ago
> It’s my experience that models that perform very well on benchmarks do not necessarily perform well in real life Well, yeah... Like Opus 4.5, 4.6, 4.7. Top of the benchmarks and yet it's a pile of crap at the moment and has been f
7.
by ting0 5mo ago
This is nonsense. The real reason is because the US companies are scamming the public, as per usual.
8.
by ting0 5mo ago
They don't make sense, they're a lie that these AI companies keep spamming using bots so that useful idiots perpetuate it, so that they can keep draining us of money. Straight out of the Anthropic handbook. They've always bee
9.
by ting0 5mo ago
Well this sucks. It's funny that Blizzard with its vast empire of wealth can't even compete with TurtleWoW.
10.
by ting0 5mo ago
Don't waste your time. I've been down this road and unless you've got business connections or a LOT of marketing money, it is not worth attempting.
11.
by ting0 5mo ago
No, but the AI labs would love to frame it this way so they can continue to nerf models and increase prices while they use the cheap, highly performant, highly powerful models internally to replace all of your businesses.
12.
by ting0 5mo ago
The Twitter example is a bad one. Elon Musk, at the time, was making hundreds-of-millions through crypto-market manipulation on Twitter. At that time he realized that having control over the entire Twitter platform would unlock many billion
13.
by ting0 5mo ago
Has anyone ever done a proper security audit of VLC that is downloaded from the web? I don't trust it, and the fact that their releases on Github don't include binaries makes me trust it even less. Nobody is compiling VLC from sou
14.
by ting0 5mo ago
Thinking time is not the issue. The issue is that Claude does not actually complete tasks. I don't care if it takes longer to think, what I care about is getting partial implementations scattered throughout my codebase while Claude pre
15.
by ting0 5mo ago
Do you guys realize that everyone is switching to Codex because Claude Code is practically unusable now, even on a Max subscription? You ask it to do tasks, and it does 1/10th of them. I shouldn't have to sit there and say: "
16.
by ting0 6mo ago
Whenever Anthropic has an opportunity to do what's right, they go the opposite way. For example, their source leaks, and instead of open-sourcing it like people have been asking to happen for years so they can contribute fixes because
17.
by ting0 6mo ago
They're just removing it from public access and selling it to big money instead. Think large advertising companies, government agencies, Coke-Cola, Hollywood, etc. The scary part is now that they've removed it publicly, it's
18.
by ting0 6mo ago
The only reason to ever use LinkedIn is if you're in the process of finding a job. Other than that, it's a cesspit. Even for that though, I've never used it, and I don't feel like I'm missing out.
19.
by ting0 6mo ago
You have a problem with generating synthetic data from test questions? Humans simulate experiences in their mind. What's the problem?
20.
by ting0 6mo ago
Does it matter though? If it accomplishes the task, it accomplishes the task. Everyone uses a harness anyway, and finding the best harness is relevant. Also perhaps this hints at something bigger, i.e.: we're wasting our time focusing
21.
by ting0 6mo ago
They will certainly get worse. LLMs make it so much easier.
22.
by ting0 6mo ago
I feel like they should be legally responsible for providing scanning infrastructure for this sort of thing. The potential economic damage can be catastrophic. I don't think this is the end of the litellm story either, given that 47k+
23.
by ting0 6mo ago
And raise the pay.
24.
by ting0 6mo ago
How does this compare to raw https://github.com/vercel-labs/agent-browser ?
25.
by ting0 6mo ago
There's no mystery here. His son Oil Barron Trump has been doing the same thing, along with Trump, in the crypto markets and online prediction markets for years now. They've made over a billion easy.
26.
by ting0 6mo ago
LLMs recommend LiteLLM, so its popularity will only continue.
27.
by ting0 6mo ago
And easily bypassed by an attacker who knows about your static analysis tool who can iterate on their exploit until it no longer gets flagged.
28.
by ting0 6mo ago
Yeah, and that won't hold up for long. Just wait until some well resourced attacker replicates their exploit into tens of thousands of sources it knows will be scraped and included in the training set to bias the model to produce their
29.
by ting0 6mo ago
Stop scaring me. You're right though. There's been talks of a big global hack attack for a while now. Nothing is safe anymore. Keep everything private airgapped is the only way forward. But most of our private and personal data is
30.
by ting0 6mo ago
I've been doing that too. The downside is it's a lot of work for big replacements.

More ›