throwupper247

6 ms·

1.
by throwupper247 11y ago
Perfect information isn't true, you don't exactly know the opponents next move. This broadens the search tree exponentially. Generally, with many hard problems, the size of the problem is a problem, when memory is limited.
2.
by throwupper247 11y ago
The irony is, germany was controlled by the allies then, including the US, the ones whose population you just called ignorant, that watches movies about prostitutes' escapedes or war glorification.
3.
by throwupper247 11y ago
The US prisson system comes to mind ... completely ridiculous comparison, I know
4.
by throwupper247 11y ago
What about Pascal's Wager? It's nonsense, given an impossible number of gods to honour
5.
by throwupper247 11y ago
I didn't talk about growth, i was specifically thinking about a comment that called our number system logarithmic and it stands to reason, if you wan't to find x in 10^x=y, unless you do calculus in your head at the age of five, y
6.
by throwupper247 11y ago
I was heavily downvoted for snarky and spiteful comments and ultimately hellbanned as I tryed to pack up my cynicism in elaborate arguments. The downvote privileged are pretty vigorous about protecting their privilege.
7.
by throwupper247 11y ago
I could do without 90% of those websites, i suppose
8.
by throwupper247 11y ago
So, in the long run they can train new folks with some of the brain that is still left. To be honest, they didn't exactly strike me with prolific creativity, rather their business enterpreneurship was working and they still profit from
9.
by throwupper247 11y ago
So, they can train new folks with some of the brain that is still left. To be honest, they didn't exactly strike me with prolific creativity, rather their business enterpreneurship was working and they still profit from that. It's
10.
by throwupper247 11y ago
In the decimal system it is just as easy to associate 5+5=10. 5xN is easier to remember than 16xN on account of 5 being the smaller number. 2^n is logarithmic whereas 5*n is linear. Arguably, logarithms are not too complicated, even if line
11.
by throwupper247 11y ago
I'm not sure if those are the meassures that guide the decision: Searching in linked lists is suboptimal (was it O(n)?), as is their cache performance. Sure, with small lists, that doesn;t matter, but how small is small enough?
12.
by throwupper247 11y ago
Having been mildly disappointed by the simplicity of monoids, after intimidation from the complexity in maths, i expect that something like an adjunction is something already known to a commoner in any case, just that the vocabulary, partic
13.
by throwupper247 11y ago
The dangerous qualities of human thought are rather simple sometimes, the difference wouldn't be that big, probably.
14.
by throwupper247 11y ago
The Credit Card probably contains a 8051 core, anyhow.
15.
by throwupper247 11y ago
It wasn't displaced, it delegated|dispatched|forked and is having a hell of a time piecing the puzzle and getting rid of the excess.
16.
by throwupper247 11y ago
But it was specifically said that providing those answeres was a benefit.
17.
by throwupper247 11y ago
Losing focus and wondering about the start of the train of thought , stackoverfloing while recursing is a first order intrinsic problem.
18.
by throwupper247 11y ago
For science and education, Fair Use terms may be applied generously.
19.
by throwupper247 11y ago
I've just written an Idris programm that determined "your mothers phone number", hows that for arbitrary facts? (tip of the hat to xkcd.)
20.
by throwupper247 11y ago
No you don't always have to, it has emotions all by itself, as you said. You are unable to make a connection from holding its hand to being responsible for its actions ? Actions include holding hands as well as thinking? What's
21.
by throwupper247 11y ago
The NN doesn't train itself, you train it, whereas the baby is first of all traines with intrinsic stimuli, its consciousness and emotions. Sure, you might not exactly know how the NN works either, but there's a middle ground betw
22.
by throwupper247 11y ago
You don't need an entire theory to see that the premisses is contrived. If the answer is as long as the problem statement, that's enough. Of course, if a philosopher sees the whole history behind it, there might be more associatio
23.
by throwupper247 11y ago
*Dijkstra
24.
by throwupper247 11y ago
No, he shares knowledge with the questioner (beyond time, if that makes sense), hence he implicitly had probable knowledge of the questions.
25.
by throwupper247 11y ago
There's a simple argument. Computers are machines and hence passive. They are programmed, they are run, etc. but whatever they think, i came up with. If you [read] this, it's logically and grammatically sound to assume, that'
26.
by throwupper247 11y ago
>Did or will the universe exist in the past or future Fixed. See, you just confirmed ThomPete's argument https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10871743 you use the wrong tense and the whole logic falls appart. I didn
27.
by throwupper247 11y ago
Responsability literally means response-ability. It's different to what I'd call self-consciousness, or what another commenter named independence.
28.
by throwupper247 11y ago
The way i know it from imgur comments it's not that bad. There the comments are not nessecarily sorted by time. What's the issue? It still discourages longer rants because every write up- and download cycle forces a short wait.
29.
by throwupper247 11y ago
They grant rights to justin but not, at least not directly or actively, to the recipient. But, the syntax is really awful and wouldn't pass any compiler if this was a programm. IMHO courts should rule in favour of the doubt for any mis
30.
by throwupper247 11y ago
the flag for "Adult Content" reminds me of anecdotes about mechanical turk workers standing in to keep uploads child friendly, now mixed with Age Identification this gets a new perspective. Is this in active use somewhere?

More ›