throwrioawfo

7 ms·

1.
by throwrioawfo 11d ago
Has any research been done to try and determine the percentage of the population that are able to detect obvious LLM-generated text?
2.
by throwrioawfo 11d ago
(1) complexity (2) performance
3.
by throwrioawfo 25d ago
Both reading and writing are necessary, but writing alone is not sufficient.
4.
by throwrioawfo 1mo ago
Self-aggrandisement
5.
by throwrioawfo 1mo ago
Even LinkedIn slop isn't as bad as this
6.
by throwrioawfo 1mo ago
Sounds like you're being highly unreasonable and childish to me
7.
by throwrioawfo 1mo ago
Gell-Mann Amnesia: the blog post
8.
by throwrioawfo 1mo ago
Nothing. I get no satisfaction out of side projects nowadays
9.
by throwrioawfo 2mo ago
Ugh, AI slop writing.
10.
by throwrioawfo 2mo ago
"cooper" derives from the verb "coop", which likely derives from Latin "cūpa", from which we get the word "cup".
11.
by throwrioawfo 2mo ago
What's the point in doing things like this if you just get Claude to do it?
12.
by throwrioawfo 3mo ago
Compliance with the absurd and draconian OSA
13.
by throwrioawfo 3mo ago
You're probably thinking of unlisted, not private.
14.
by throwrioawfo 3mo ago
I feel like things have become so much more cynical in the last 5 years, in this regard. I feel like part of it is the "over-systemization" of promos. I see the logic behind it to some extent - if there's a system, it's
15.
by throwrioawfo 3mo ago
If you're going to fork out 40k, why not get an actual rack rather than fashioning one yourself out of plywood...
16.
by throwrioawfo 3mo ago
> doing ALMOST what I asked it to do, but just not quite This is my exact experience. LLMs get 95% of the way to my personal quality bar, and for simple tasks 100% of the way. More complex things, no. This means that, in practice, I end
17.
by throwrioawfo 3mo ago
Sure, it can see obvious stuff in images, but as far as I'm aware it is not designed for (or tested on) performing the kind microscopic analysis that radiology involves
18.
by throwrioawfo 3mo ago
Not sure I would put much faith in the stats of this clearly vibecoded slopsite
19.
by throwrioawfo 3mo ago
It kinda makes sense, given the sheer magnitude of money on the line.
20.
by throwrioawfo 3mo ago
There was once a time when I'd see a page like this and think "wow, must be a great project with such a polished website". Now, it's just a neutral or perhaps even very slightly negative signal (especially the em-dash in
21.
by throwrioawfo 3mo ago
> presumably NSA-blessed You have your answer
22.
by throwrioawfo 3mo ago
> Shared-memory threads for JavaScriptCore. new Thread(fn) runs fn on another thread, in the same heap, with the same objects. No structured clone, no message passing, no SharedArrayBuffer-only escape hatch. You share an object by sharin
23.
by throwrioawfo 3mo ago
What I find annoying is when people paste lazy ChatGPT slop into Hacker News and pollute the front page.
24.
by throwrioawfo 3mo ago
Good
25.
by throwrioawfo 4mo ago
You're not actually meant to _read_ these reports.