throwmeoutplzdo

4 ms·

1.
by throwmeoutplzdo 7mo ago
”[…] the times I was so naive and idealistic.” ”[…] I envy the worldview it's possible someone can take money from another and still maintain independence.” Do you believe relying on our legal system is naive and idealistic? What would
2.
by throwmeoutplzdo 7mo ago
The legal structures that mandate what power google actually has over mozilla still presumably exist though. Pretending that we are in full blown dictatorship is, in my view, still cynical. Though of course there’s no telling how far we wil
3.
by throwmeoutplzdo 7mo ago
You’re mixing up funding with control. Mozilla Corporation takes money from Google for search placement. That doesn’t turn it into a subsidiary. Google doesn’t own it, doesn’t run its roadmap, and doesn’t ship its code. Mozilla negotiates s
4.
by throwmeoutplzdo 8mo ago
It should be at a minimum stored safely. How and why are the environmental effects not a factor for you?
5.
by throwmeoutplzdo 8mo ago
How and why are the environmental effects not a factor for you?
6.
by throwmeoutplzdo 9mo ago
Sure, and of course the elephant in the room is overconsumption and planetary overload, which get unlocked too on a bigger scale as a result of similar thinking. Which ends does unlocking potentially endless ”experiences” serve? Our persona
7.
by throwmeoutplzdo 1y ago
Or Meat, if they were completely honest about their users’ role in the equation </compulsory matrix reference>
8.
by throwmeoutplzdo 2y ago
And you could argue the competition is about creating meaning and orchestrating a story rather than individual words. Even if you use AI to actually produce the individual words and still edit the text afterwards to match your meaning, firs