throwmeout123

5 ms·

1.
by throwmeout123 3y ago
And what is their algorithm? How to identify those industries?
2.
by throwmeout123 3y ago
Open source is unsustainable if we act like this. A 100k grant costs a fraction of the latest leetcode wanker member of the blind church of tc. Add to it a couple of seniors to mentor the dude a couple afternoons a Week and you’re steering
3.
by throwmeout123 3y ago
I have no idea, but i can copy some data from the package: One is SV AS +2.5 sphere 0 cyl duravision platinum uv 1.60 index (guess this is what you’re talking about) uvprotect The other is the same but 1.25 sphere Hope it helps
4.
by throwmeout123 3y ago
Would it be possible to identify those companies and then build new companies just to be acquired? Nice chunk of change every 3 years…
5.
by throwmeout123 3y ago
I have zeiss lenses on my glasses, they’re terrible. Full of scratches in 1.5 years. Worst money I’ve ever spent, my last no name €80 lenses went for years without a single scratch! Anecdata obviously
6.
by throwmeout123 3y ago
More like the tiranny of people whose job title matches .*[Pp]roduct.* They are the real scourge of our industry; I never met one who wasnt hellbent on raising some kind of meaningless number that people who don’t talk to the customer decid
7.
by throwmeout123 3y ago
Your point makes a lot of sense, but then everyone wants that small bit of customization that substantially destroys the whole idea of a design system. Not to mention that while making sense for the government, which might have contractors
8.
by throwmeout123 3y ago
Yeah a bit, been a victim of cheating and rule lawyering. My paper magic experience evolved to “pay attention to what the other guy is doing” rather than thinking about my game plan. As a draw go player, it becomes unsustainable for my ment
9.
by throwmeout123 3y ago
Decent insights but nothing earth shattering The whole point is ignoring the dogmatism of our profession full of various shamans with magic formulas to solve everything from scrum to xp to tdd to rust to functional programming to ood etc. T
10.
by throwmeout123 3y ago
The design system, where once productive FE devs go to die thinking everyone should use it
11.
by throwmeout123 3y ago
Learn to manaweave, cheat, call “judge”, fix matches and artistically stack the deck when cracking fetches and you’ll be there in no time. Too much variance to go regularly 9-0 and stuff like that
12.
by throwmeout123 3y ago
I wouldnt but the container setup was the same to prod
13.
by throwmeout123 3y ago
Yw, not really hard but since we’re not a php shop it required a lot of research, trial and error, complexity as in “need to know something not related to Application or domain” and ops are unhappy at having to support this one of a kind se
14.
by throwmeout123 3y ago
For a Production setup we had to configure an nginx container plus the FPM container, let em talk, Configure some more Commands to enable/disable xdebug (that requires a restart of the containers since it needs a php estension) and i t
15.
by throwmeout123 3y ago
Uhm, I live and i Was born in sicily. MMD lived a great life with a lot of money in comparison to shitty overtaxed italian salaries and got arrested just to get medical attention without enacting the Andrea bonafede identity. He was seen ma
16.
by throwmeout123 3y ago
Of the brainwashed elixir zealots trying to convince everyone to use phoenix for a 3 users internal dashboard Fearless concurrency with actor model
17.
by throwmeout123 3y ago
You want fpm for non hobby projects
18.
by throwmeout123 3y ago
Classic php ecommmerce customer: miserable cheapskate that thinks saving 80 dollars a year is great, had my fair share of these
19.
by throwmeout123 3y ago
You almost convinced me to try it again but then i remember about: * php.ini * php extensions * hardish deploy needing a specially configured web server * huge number of terribly named builtins * functions returning int|bool|null|whoknows *
20.
by throwmeout123 3y ago
Not really. They just stopped killing and now have more lucrative business and habits, less in the spotlight of the public opinion.
21.
by throwmeout123 3y ago
Excellent. Python is becoming horrible and losing many of the good qualities it had to cater to a crowd of people that would be better served by java and c# Popularity is a curse, quality goes downhill superfast
22.
by throwmeout123 3y ago
The proposal in question is not that good so maybe the order of the dicts is more interesting :P
23.
by throwmeout123 3y ago
The craft is solving the problem, not endlessly circling around it. perfect is the enemy of good
24.
by throwmeout123 3y ago
Literature never included the aspect of being public. In any case your colleagues read it, so it’s actually read by someone
25.
by throwmeout123 3y ago
Software IS writing. Software IS literature. You might disagree right now but that’s what it is.
26.
by throwmeout123 3y ago
They make sense as reactions but are absolutely awful in prose. Emoji spam (specially rocket) is the litmus test for “people i dont want to work with”
27.
by throwmeout123 3y ago
But its also not a framework as it offers barely any facilities for mid+ size projects, which immediately start to crack under the weight of trying to reimplement Django
28.
by throwmeout123 3y ago
Maybe YOU should stop calling other people lazy for something actually very productive, aka not wasting million hours tinkering with lua for marginal returns over investment, often on company time…
29.
by throwmeout123 3y ago
Cant wait until you create your programming language to use in the company you created racking up the optimal millions while laughing at us lazy slobs!
30.
by throwmeout123 3y ago
Scala 3 could be a great “new python” but it has too many community and governance issues, and also the haskalator people which has been nothing but a scourge for the lang. Let’s hope they dont also destroy rust.

More ›