throwingrocks

5 ms·

1.
by throwingrocks 26d ago
Can’t have Hacker News without the hubris! Love it
2.
The Fanfare Around the Band Geese Was a Psyop(wired.com)
3 points by throwingrocks 5mo ago|0 comments
3.
by throwingrocks 5mo ago
I had to check as well. Their logos are also similar.
4.
by throwingrocks 10mo ago
It’s simply not a better name. If it was, it would’ve caught on by now.
5.
by throwingrocks 10mo ago
SSR isn’t a craze. Web applications have been served that way for literal decades now.
6.
by throwingrocks 11mo ago
> The whole point of free software should be that I do not have to adapt to some companies's idea of what is modern, if I do not want to. This hasn’t changed.
7.
by throwingrocks 11mo ago
Geez. Do you really think the number matters? I would be grateful to the creator even if it was 3 days.
8.
by throwingrocks 11mo ago
Literal eye roll. It’s close enough.
9.
by throwingrocks 1y ago
The article touches on this by framing chronic inflammation (e.g. exposure to air pollution over years) as the problem.
10.
by throwingrocks 1y ago
Surprised by the amount of mentions of ECMAScript here. It’s the worst possible name to me.
11.
by throwingrocks 1y ago
> instead of writing 100 class names for every element, every page, every project, again and again… I'm turned off from daisyUI with marketing like this. The alternative to daisyUI certainly isn't this. I use Tailwind in a simi
12.
by throwingrocks 1y ago
> bulkshitter With all due respect, this perspective baffles me. Some see it your way, others see so much opportunity.
13.
by throwingrocks 1y ago
> There is a popular argument that a software developer’s job is not write software but to solve a user’s problem. Bullshit Wait, what? > I was never particularly interested in the code itself > Instead, I was always more intereste
14.
by throwingrocks 1y ago
Remix or React Router + Vite is still great.
15.
by throwingrocks 1y ago
> IMO if one has to work this hard to sell/explain a tech there's 2 possibilities 1/ there is no real need of tech 2/ it's a flawed abstraction There’s of course a third option: the solution justifies the complex
16.
by throwingrocks 1y ago
This comment section is predictably boring and shows that HN isn’t always a great place for discourse. Change is hard, I guess.
17.
by throwingrocks 2y ago
From the article > This is not the dinosaur killer. This is not the planet killer. This is at most dangerous for a city
18.
by throwingrocks 2y ago
These days, vendor lock-in hardly feels like a worthwhile consideration when evaluating frameworks. A near complete rewrite feels inevitable when transitioning from, say, React to Svelte.
19.
by throwingrocks 2y ago
> most smart people know what the term “cargo cult” means from Feynman Unsure which group you’re in after making this generalization
20.
by throwingrocks 2y ago
Sorry AI, not taking the bait today.
21.
by throwingrocks 2y ago
That’s fine. Not everyone needs to “get it”. Some like it. Some don’t. Cool.
22.
by throwingrocks 3y ago
The _very_ first paragraph quotes a Muslim saying "It’s the destruction of our religion.”.
23.
by throwingrocks 3y ago
Looks like the application process will take a few minutes online. Why is this news right now?
24.
by throwingrocks 3y ago
Are there any privacy safe companies out there that provides similar services? I’m interested in the ancestry and health aspects of 23andMe, but I obviously don’t trust the company.
25.
by throwingrocks 3y ago
Huh? I didn’t say I used it. Being optional doesn’t change the thing that it is annoying. It is annoying which is precisely why I just….don’t.
26.
by throwingrocks 3y ago
Huh? I didn’t say I used it. Something optional can still be annoying. That’s I just…don’t.
27.
by throwingrocks 3y ago
Seems like you assume everyone likes window snapping because you do. It’s one of the most annoying aspects of using Windows for me.
28.
by throwingrocks 3y ago
> now my defacto playbook for building lasting bottom up disruptive cloud companies What companies have you built (or played a role in building) using this "playbook" that fit your description?
29.
by throwingrocks 3y ago
> No. No. Saying “no” multiple times as if a statement is so absurdly wrong is such a meme at this point and another interesting difference between face to face and online interactions. I can’t imagine having a discussion with friends an
30.
by throwingrocks 4y ago
In addition to that piece, Matt Levine also did an excellent analysis https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2023-03-14/svb-to...

More ›