throwfaraway135

10 ms·

1.
by throwfaraway135 6d ago
there were some, but considering how monumental it was many people including me consider it a lackluster effort[1] [1] https://theprint.in/opinion/pov/silence-epstein-files-global...
2.
by throwfaraway135 6d ago
It is a shame but there are almost no true grassroots political organizations, most of them are payed, bought or employed by someone. A very good example of this is that we don't see any major feminist rallies against how the governmen
3.
by throwfaraway135 7d ago
I always see this type of articles as sexist, implying that if a sex is better than the other in some sport than that is a sign of superiority.
4.
by throwfaraway135 11d ago
In our current age none of them.
5.
by throwfaraway135 11d ago
I don't trust anything governed by the EU government, they will censor/take down anything that's even mildly inconvenient for them.
6.
by throwfaraway135 12d ago
Working with any AI tool means you trust the vendor, sometimes you don't have a choice because the best models/tools are from specific providers. IBM isn't a company I would ever trust.
7.
by throwfaraway135 15d ago
I see that translators need to take some liberties when translating something from ancient Greek to modern English, but at what point does it become an interpretation instead of a translation. Being Nolans "source" for the Odyssey
8.
by throwfaraway135 15d ago
my argument is not about who killed whom but: Historically there is no reason why the US can't call a lake (owned by it or not) whatever it wants. Other countries will call it what's most convenient (if there is an disagreement th
9.
by throwfaraway135 16d ago
If killing/raping/burning the original inhabitants and stealing the city is good enough for the word to call Constantinople Istambul I don't see why the US which owns part of the lake can't call it something else.
10.
by throwfaraway135 16d ago
No people of power do what they want an regular people don't care until other people of power tell them to care.
11.
by throwfaraway135 16d ago
calling him king was a satire making fun of him, the fact you didn't catch that is funny
12.
by throwfaraway135 16d ago
I'm not trolling, people/counties of power do what they want, today the west doesn't call Constantinople Istambul because it's the correct name but because the Turks are stronger than the Greeks. And pretending that this
13.
by throwfaraway135 16d ago
Why shouldn't a country have the right to change the name of something in it's own vocabulary? We change names of streets all the time. If the US wants to call it Lake America or Lake Donald the God Emperor of Mankind or something
14.
by throwfaraway135 16d ago
Another day another distraction, just don't think about the Epstein files. Prediction: the files won't be released even after Trump is out of the White House, independently who wins.
15.
by throwfaraway135 20d ago
Western game studios are failing, look at Ubisoft, Bungie, and a dozen Xbox studios, most of which are collapsing due to a sheer lack of creativity. How Hollywood, which is going through its own dark patch, expects to find creative inspirat
16.
by throwfaraway135 20d ago
Because whatever you think of how Musk is running Twitter it's still the most pro freedom of speech platform out there. You can hear ideas(propaganda) from almost all major players, while a UN-operated global social media would be even
17.
by throwfaraway135 21d ago
The game is considered part of the culture war, but that's not the reason I was surprised to see it, apple is a left leaning company so there is nothing strange about them choosing it from a political perspective. What was surprising w
18.
by throwfaraway135 22d ago
"M6 features a powerful, larger 12-core GPU that provides higher geometry rates and updated Dynamic Caching to deliver stunning visuals and fluid frame rates in demanding games like Mixtape." Why choose the worst game of the year?
19.
by throwfaraway135 26d ago
Life is considered the highest value in the west. So let me ask you this. Is the life of a person less worth than your privacy?
20.
by throwfaraway135 26d ago
One reason we see so much thinning in the current media(books, films, music etc.) is that old western/European media is considered tainted by history, so you need to reinvent or change it sufficiently to be different.
21.
by throwfaraway135 28d ago
I get that you don't like Twitter/Facebook/Reddit or whatever, but a clear solution to this problem is to hurt googles public image as much as you can and for that you need a platform with as large of a reach as possible. edi
22.
by throwfaraway135 1mo ago
Crazy that you need to hardcode this, Opus 4.6 <election_info> There was a US Presidential Election in November 2024. Donald Trump won the presidency over Kamala Harris. If asked about the election, or the US election, Claude can tell
23.
by throwfaraway135 1mo ago
Not paying is a form of censorship.
24.
by throwfaraway135 1mo ago
There is no solution based on censorship that doesn't undermine democracy. If you want Facebook to censor people/content/ideas that you don't like it is going also to censor vital information needed for a democracy to wo
25.
by throwfaraway135 1mo ago
I agree that water is an important resource but the wording of "consumption" always rubbed me the wrong way. Is the water contaminated with chemicals? Maybe heat? Can people or wildlife consume it? Can you use rainwater?
26.
by throwfaraway135 1mo ago
As a rule decay accelerates as time goes on, won't be surprised if we see talent and wealth leave the city in a couple of years.
27.
by throwfaraway135 2mo ago
Thanks for the Fukuyama reference will look him up more. But my argument is not that homogeneous populations can't be low trust, but that diverse societies are almost always significantly more low trust than their counterparts. Fukuyam
28.
by throwfaraway135 2mo ago
If you read canceling as part of the "cancel culture" and not canceling the subscription, then this two statements seam contradictory > Cancelling "Hey" > I definitely don't believe in trying to change people&
29.
by throwfaraway135 2mo ago
Depends for whom. For the people? No For the trillion dollar bloated closed AI companies? Yes
30.
by throwfaraway135 2mo ago
AI submissions and AI judges a match made in (AI) heaven.

More ›