Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
throwawayswede
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
1.
▲
by
throwawayswede
5y ago
The concept is terrible, whether it was done "as benign as it gets" or not. The idea that this kind of bullshit content (that's obviously only written to be a marketing channel) is accepted as normal is exactly why it's
2.
▲
by
throwawayswede
5y ago
> This is a post about a bug in Safari, but if you just want to ship a Phoenix app, the easiest way to learn more is to try it out; you can be up and running in just a couple minutes I'm sort of sick of this phenomena/trend of
3.
▲
by
throwawayswede
5y ago
Not here to argue. Enjoy your gulag.
4.
▲
by
throwawayswede
5y ago
Windows is trying to swallow linux. That's all there is to it.
5.
▲
by
throwawayswede
5y ago
Ffs, can't people just use they editor they want and be happy with it? Does it always have to overcome and take over every other editor? What the fuck does "the new emacs" mean?
6.
▲
by
throwawayswede
5y ago
He'd be horrified at what Reddit has become.
7.
▲
Dunning–Kruger Effect
(en.wikipedia.org)
5 points
by
throwawayswede
5y ago
|
0 comments
8.
▲
by
throwawayswede
5y ago
I’m curious if there been any mention of AR/VR in sci-fi or popular culture in general in a positive light? Almost all I can think of is dystopian and does not invoke the positive imagery that Fb seems to be playing at. Who’s their tar
9.
▲
by
throwawayswede
5y ago
Yeah that’s a weird attitude to have, the only reason there are users who feel personally hurt by the attitude Mozilla has been taking for the past few years is because they know things could be going way better. No one is arguing that tele
10.
▲
by
throwawayswede
5y ago
No. Mozilla is actually helping Google build and maintain a monopoly on search (for money) and is accepting the scraps that Google leaves on the table from the browser market. Mozilla has continuously and repeatedly fucked up when it comes
11.
▲
by
throwawayswede
5y ago
The one thing that's more annoying than Facebook are the whistleblowers of Facebook (like that frances haugen character, which I'm fairly certain is a spook). Such a cheap and condescending group of people who think they know more
12.
▲
by
throwawayswede
5y ago
I'm happy that Emacs community doesn't have a lot of those who think that "everything should be easy" and that working hard to learn something is a waste of time by default. Emacs is great with or without your usage of i
13.
▲
by
throwawayswede
5y ago
Who comes up with garbage naming techniques such is 5D? What the fuck do they expect people to think when they hear that?
14.
▲
by
throwawayswede
5y ago
Inception level guessing and assumptions you're making all in this thread.
15.
▲
by
throwawayswede
5y ago
I don't think it's not considered real work by engineers, but by non-engineer product managers.
16.
▲
by
throwawayswede
5y ago
The point is not in explaining "bad faith", but in explaining how and why the comment you're replying to is "bad faith". Was not clear to me at all that you were being sarcastic.
17.
▲
by
throwawayswede
5y ago
So should be quoting HN rules without explaining exactly and very specifically how and what you're referencing applies.
18.
▲
by
throwawayswede
5y ago
I'd agree, but only for journals funded with public money. Otherwise, no, news shouldn't necessarily be free. And this is not "news" exactly. Analysis articles cost money to produce and write, their authors should be all
19.
▲
by
throwawayswede
5y ago
Can't read because published on reader hostile platform.
20.
▲
by
throwawayswede
5y ago
Only initially, then he turns out to be a douche.
21.
▲
by
throwawayswede
5y ago
Both of these look like “cool hacker names” from a movie…
22.
▲
by
throwawayswede
5y ago
> I personally would remove this post altogether, given it violates copyright. Good thing tyrannical people like you are not the moderators here.
23.
▲
by
throwawayswede
5y ago
You're not. That's not what I said. There's nothing wrong with calling someone's behavior (emphasis on "behavior") a bit dickish! We all do it.
24.
▲
by
throwawayswede
5y ago
What's ironic is that the first thing you see when you hit wired.co.uk: > Wired > We and our partners store and/or access information on a device, such as unique IDs in cookies to process personal data. You may accept or man
25.
▲
by
throwawayswede
5y ago
Mentioning a moderator is a calling for moderation action. If you just wanted it reposted you could’ve just repost yourself. That would’ve been the actual “additive action”. I’m aware of the practice. Copycats will copy. You could’ve repost
26.
▲
by
throwawayswede
5y ago
True, and I’m not arguing that this person deserves more (or any) credit than the other, my gripe is with calling for moderation straight up as if he’s almost calling the police. I should’ve made it clear that that is the dickish part imho
27.
▲
by
throwawayswede
5y ago
The point is not in giving credit, but in taking credit away. All these boards are based on luck. Trying to argue agains why one got up and the other didn’t isn’t constructive. It’s verging on toxic imho
28.
▲
by
throwawayswede
5y ago
Again, for the millionth time, the issue is not that they had to comply with the law. Stop pretending to misunderstand, all this bullshit is quite obvious. Proton mail lied, and then pretended like they didn’t. They decided it makes sense t
29.
▲
by
throwawayswede
5y ago
Stop intentionally missing the point. It's not about them complying with the law or not, it's about them promising something that they did not deliver on, regardless of whether they couldn't because they didn't know or t
30.
▲
by
throwawayswede
5y ago
Lol, dude, you're missing the entire point. I understand it hurts to learn that a company you've been paying turned out not to be what it claims to be, but no one is "tossing around" wikipedia links other than you. And y
More ›