throwawaymedia

15 ms·

1.
by throwawaymedia 3y ago
That was quick. Imagine he was a politician (or a son of a politician... looking at you, Hunter Biden). That would take another several years of investigation and then he'd be let go.
2.
by throwawaymedia 3y ago
"racist trees", "racist doorbell", "racist photos"... my god, when will all this nonsense stop? When will the mass media stop feeding people with that crap? As a lesson, every single news company that writes ab
3.
by throwawaymedia 4y ago
I just can't stress enough the amount of US propaganda you've put in your mouth. Chechen War has nothing to do with Georgia/Ukraine/NATO/etc. It's a different conflict. Moldova was attacked by both Russia and
4.
by throwawaymedia 4y ago
This is a proxy war between the US and Russia. Nobody gives a shit about Ukraine. Why do you think the US is pouring money into this war like crazy? There was no threat from Russia before 2007. There were no events to push other countries t
5.
by throwawaymedia 4y ago
I stand for truth and justice. NATO is the threat. The US cannot simply lie about NATO's good intentions, because in Eastern Europe they are not. It's unfortunate that Russia has to use "the war" mechanism to prevent the
6.
by throwawaymedia 4y ago
I support Mearsheimer's reasoning because there is a logic behind it. There are no scientists that would provide an opposite reasoning as logical as the Mearsheimer's one. > CATO Institute is fucking dumb :) ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ >
7.
by throwawaymedia 4y ago
Why should the West do anything on the opposite side of the globe? Why does the West only care about democracy in the countries with a lot of natural resources? Oh yea, that must be a pure coincidence.
8.
by throwawaymedia 4y ago
You are exhausted, but you still haven't answered my question. Why is J. Mearsheimer's reasoning incorrect, but yours is correct? He is a political scientist with decades of experience. Here is one more from CATO Institute : http
9.
by throwawaymedia 4y ago
> No, there's theorising by John Mearsheimer which you subscribe to. It's an ideology of realpolitik/offensive realism, I've read it, I've watched it, I know what you mean and that's just a take, a view on t
10.
by throwawaymedia 4y ago
> defensive alliance against whom? > not the country that continually attempts to annex and invade post soviet states when? post the NATO expansion? > Ah yes I keep forgetting the US forced Russia to invade and then after that they
11.
by throwawaymedia 4y ago
I do not support Russia. But I do understand why Russia is doing what they are doing. There is a logical chain of events that led to the conflict. I do strongly support the idea that the US is the core issue here. Unfortunately, the US is n
12.
by throwawaymedia 4y ago
I intentionally asked you these questions so that you could answer the main question by yourself. Russia has always been reluctant to NATO–the expansion was one of the main topics post-USSR crash. Munich, 2007-Putin gives a massive speech o
13.
by throwawaymedia 4y ago
Ok, smarty. Why was there a conflict in Georgia? What were the events that led to it? > Russia decided to escalate that and annex Crimea in 2014 Putin CLEARLY said that he will annex Crimea if X. What is that X?
14.
by throwawaymedia 4y ago
I'm not a Russian shill. I pay my taxes in the US, and, apparently, my actions sponsor the war.
15.
by throwawaymedia 4y ago
When Ukraine hits Poland (even by mistake), people take step back and blame Russia, because Ukraine wouldn't have had to use an anti-missile system if there was no Russian missile in the first place. Fair enough. Now, why don't pe
16.
by throwawaymedia 4y ago
What Russia is doing is the result of something else. That something else is the root cause of the war in Ukraine.
17.
by throwawaymedia 5y ago
He is neither pro-Kremlin nor anti-Kremlin. Mearsheimer is a political scientist with 50+ years of experience. He relies on pure facts and explains why things are the way they are. Nothing more, nothing less.
18.
by throwawaymedia 5y ago
You are right, Ukraine doesn't need the approval of Russia, however, becoming a member of NATO is only possible if membership does not affect security of any other country. That's written on paper and one of the conditions. But si
19.
by throwawaymedia 5y ago
I'm Ukrainian, but I just want to throw a provocative thought in here. Everyone's talking about how bad and evil Putin is and all that. However, nobody's talking about the _why_ Putin is doing what he's doing. For the pa
20.
by throwawaymedia 5y ago
> Yes, I do believe it should or at least decriminalized. There is much more danger in illegal drug trade and a dysfunctional uneducated society. Once again, similar to what I said to the other commenter. Fix the uneducated society first
21.
by throwawaymedia 5y ago
> Similarly, distribution (sale) to minors and without proper packaging should remain against the law. That will only worsen the situation in the US public schools, which is already a massive problem. If a substance is allowed to your da
22.
by throwawaymedia 5y ago
You can't legalize marijuana while education is subpar. It has to be done the opposite way. Also, why to legalize something that is harmful to your body and brain [1]? I mean, there are SO many publications about it. [1] https:/&
23.
by throwawaymedia 5y ago
> 1. the war against drugs has been useless How do you define uselessness? What's the metric? > 2. it even simplifies the lives of criminals In which sense? Weed has massive margins. Legalization means less competition, lower pri
24.
by throwawaymedia 5y ago
I'm not spouting anything dangerous. The data is indeed overwhelming and you must be living under a rock if you are not familiar with the numbers. > every death that could have been avoided, of which many are documented on social me
25.
by throwawaymedia 5y ago
According to what we have today there is no need to vaccinate healthy young people.
26.
by throwawaymedia 5y ago
Excuse me? There are dozens of papers available now confirming my words.
27.
by throwawaymedia 5y ago
Nobody knows.
28.
by throwawaymedia 5y ago
Why is this one being downvoted when in fact what OP is saying is a 100% truth? Vaccines won't stop the spread because it's a sliding window problem. You vaccinate 10m people today, then you vaccinate 10m people tomorrow, by the t
29.
by throwawaymedia 5y ago
Can _you_ provide any other legitimate data point that tracks adverse vaccine reactions? Most likely not. Because the narrative is such that if there is anything negative comes out, people are immediately being canceled or fired.
30.
by throwawaymedia 5y ago
> Ventavia executive identified three site staff members with whom to “Go over e-diary issue/falsifying data, etc.” One of them was “verbally counseled for changing data and not noting late entry,” a note indicates. > At several

More ›