throwawaylinux

7 ms·

61.
by throwawaylinux 3y ago
Who alleged that?
62.
by throwawaylinux 3y ago
Sorry to hear that. Must be be a heavy thing to carry.
63.
by throwawaylinux 3y ago
SPU is significantly derivative from PowerPC, so that's quite expected.
64.
by throwawaylinux 3y ago
> overconfident > solutions What's more tiresome is people spouting rambling and incoherent "critiques" of others which they are incapable of substantiating due to their dishonesty and/or other mental deficiencies.
65.
by throwawaylinux 3y ago
So just to confirm, you are in the government, and you view people who say the government should be held accountable for its actions as "the enemy", is that right? If not it should be simple to explain how you thought I saw you as
66.
by throwawaylinux 3y ago
I'm sorry you're so angry you're resorting to not addressing my comments and doing the "I know you are but what am I" shtick, while still being incapable of pointing out this fanciful "over-confident solution&q
67.
by throwawaylinux 3y ago
> That is how to conflate branches of government. It's the government though. The point from the start was that the judicial branch is part of government control. You are the one confused if you don't understand that. > IMO
68.
by throwawaylinux 3y ago
> You have conflated major separate branches of not only government, but also society in general. Where? > You then build on top of these simplifications in the most general of terms in an attempt to strengthen your ideas about power
69.
by throwawaylinux 3y ago
> In contrast to … ? Systems of government in your utopian visions? Non sequitur. One does not have to contrast something with something else to make a statement about it. > You have made a sport out of oversimplifying complicated mat
70.
by throwawaylinux 3y ago
> Private legal system with non-profit counsel. Would be interesting to try it again, but no state would ever revert that kind of power to its citizens. "Over-confident" "solution" This is just too much, it's sat
71.
by throwawaylinux 3y ago
Presumably the people coming through these programs are a drop in the ocean next to number of Americans fluent in Chinese and Spanish, and likely able to teach it at quite a high level without a specific degree for that language.
72.
by throwawaylinux 3y ago
I don't see how your comment address what I wrote. Systems of government are set up to gain and keep power over their citizens, and western governments have this down to a science, which is to give people the illusion they have freedom
73.
by throwawaylinux 3y ago
Would be a government which is bound to work in the in the interests and to the will of the people, and one where bureaucrats, politicians, judges, police, and other officials receive hash punishments if they are found to have lied or profi
74.
by throwawaylinux 3y ago
> How do you suppose that technology came about? By people, inventors, creatives, entrepreneurs, explorers. Certainly not government or bureaucracy. Many of the most incredible inventions, discoveries, and creative works came about under
75.
by throwawaylinux 3y ago
Aahaha, "nobody may have an opinion about how they are governed, or an interest in thinking about different possibilities unless they are 'experts'". That's rich. Exactly what some kind of self-proclaimed "gove
76.
by throwawaylinux 3y ago
> You seem to equate government with the wealthy elite? Strange. > If not, do you think, there is anything positive, the government is doing? Yes. > And the question was, if it is possible for a lowly citizen today, to do anything
77.
by throwawaylinux 3y ago
> national security, civic safety of any kind, health care, migration, education. I can see a lot of arrows pointing towards centralization of power and for good reasons. Many "liberal western democracy" governments do very bad
78.
by throwawaylinux 3y ago
Sounds like the kind of "win" where the government tells the government that the government has to stop excessive surveillance and the government promises the government it will and then it doesn't, and it also starts spying
79.
by throwawaylinux 3y ago
You might not, but you might. And there's nothing about a liberal democracy that says government must have a massive centralized concentration of power, it just happens to be going that way because power begets power.
80.
by throwawaylinux 3y ago
I think you're romanticizing the present. There is no law that results in monotonic increase in "goodness" of social systems over time. It can appear that way if you look at the past few hundred or thousand years because incr
81.
by throwawaylinux 3y ago
Private legal system with non-profit counsel. Would be interesting to try it again, but no state would ever revert that kind of power to its citizens.
82.
by throwawaylinux 3y ago
It's very cool, I just don't know what I would ever do with it. And I'm not saying that means therefore I don't see why anybody else would need or want it, I would never use it though. I was thinking about running an eth
83.
by throwawaylinux 3y ago
Maybe it only seems divisive depending on what side of the divide you find yourself. I've seen a lot of hateful, unhinged, divisive attacks from the health establishment on ordinary people in the past few years. Much of it cheered on b
84.
by throwawaylinux 3y ago
x86 lock-in benefits AMD greatly, just as it does Intel. It is my belief that they started looking at ARM cores when they thought they would never be able to be competitive with Intel in x86 (pre-Zen was a bad time for AMD). And when it bec
85.
by throwawaylinux 3y ago
Rule 46. They can ask you anything, but you don't have to answer.
86.
by throwawaylinux 3y ago
Is it that easy? There would be some tractable number of arrangements this would spit out, and from there you can work backwards and find all materials that could form these arrangements, and try to synthesize them and see what works? Might
87.
by throwawaylinux 3y ago
> I’m saying that if their models worked in a predictive way, since they have been established for so long and the value of confirming them is so high, they would have been confirmed by now. So, just run all possible materials through th
88.
by throwawaylinux 3y ago
There are security teams and/or methodologies inside all major CPU designers today that look at speculation and other side channels. Although these might still not be up to quite the kind of rigor that you see in traditional verificati
89.
by throwawaylinux 3y ago
> 1) If his models could predict useful room temperature superconductors, it seems we would have found one already. How do you arrive at this?
90.
by throwawaylinux 3y ago
It actually wasn't bad in its time, and it's not about the technology its the conventions. Those purple/blue borders were immediately recognizable as links. A lot of people today wouldn't understand it, but a lot of peop

More ›