throwaway9832

5 ms·

1.
by throwaway9832 1y ago
If you think the measure of driving rusk isn’t per km, then you have absolutely no idea what you’re talking about. And just repeating things doesn’t make them different, up to 7.5 tones, it is the same speed and that is plenty enough differ
2.
by throwaway9832 1y ago
If you stick to 100, then every tom, dick, and harry will overtake you creating a lot of opportunity for mistakes.
3.
by throwaway9832 1y ago
I reply because "studies have show that claims of studies have show are often false". There is absolutely zero chance any respectable study would support that focusing on maintaining exactly 110 km in a 110km is safer than allowin
4.
by throwaway9832 1y ago
You, just like the grandparent, confuse egregious 0% tolerance speed enforcement with speed limits. Speed limits dictates stopping distance and is a key factor in collision avoidance. No one is asking to abolish speed limits. The problem is
5.
by throwaway9832 1y ago
The legislation in the Anglosphere countries? Are you slow? Where in Australia, New Zealand, Singapore, UK, Canada, or even most of US can you go 10 km/h over speed limit and not get fined? For your other points. 1. Where? other than s
6.
by throwaway9832 1y ago
Every problem is solved. We should stop making anything. Specially CRUD apps, because how is that even programming? What does it solve that hasn't been solved? This line of thinking is not productive. It is a mistake to see yourself as
7.
by throwaway9832 1y ago
Yes, that is a pretty fair characterization. The reasons is because most accidents happens due to inattention and over confidence, hazardous roads makes people pay more attention. A distracted person is more dangerous than a drunkard on the
8.
by throwaway9832 1y ago
10 is plenty old enough to drive under supervision. We used to send people to war at 16. The idea of stopping people from driving until 18 is infantilisation.