throwaway7808

5 ms·

1.
by throwaway7808 12y ago
I guess you are being downvoted, because the fact "DNA can survive (re?)entry from space" is not a proof .
2.
by throwaway7808 12y ago
"The final geocentricism.". Duh. You could be in a mixed state of |life had originated on earth| + |life had originated elsewhere| + |physics doesn't actually exists, and you are just a bitstring|. edit: downvoter ;) you are
3.
by throwaway7808 12y ago
1M is sometimes all the memory that you have, on the embedded systems. And sometimes it is less. For example, it could be 68 bytes. PIC 16F84A - 1K Program Memory, 68 bytes Data Memory, 64 bytes EEPROM
4.
by throwaway7808 12y ago
Whenever I'm finding it appropriate to do so. I'm a computer science researcher, I have a right to that opinion and I sincerely expect this to be the most likely outcome. I do not see anything wrong in stating it bluntly and clear
5.
by throwaway7808 12y ago
Most likely you and your kids are gonna be wiped out by intellegent machines just in a few decades.
6.
by throwaway7808 12y ago
""" Friedman, laureate of the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economics, said: "You want more insider trading, not less. You want to give the people most likely to have knowledge about deficiencies of the company an incentive to
7.
by throwaway7808 12y ago
Yes, you are correct. On an average Linux box to have a single cache line data transfer between the cores under 150ns 99% of the time is about the best that you can get. Especially if you are running stock kernel that eats this 1% and creat
8.
by throwaway7808 12y ago
Duh. Common. Describe me just one automated strategy for which $130k would not be a phenomenal outlier. And you were talking multiple strategies...
9.
by throwaway7808 12y ago
Now you are just bullshitting. A 130k is a huge loss and a phenomental outlier. You've never had even a 100k loss on your strategies. And by current standards your strategies are not even HFT. I've seen you talking milliseconds.
10.
by throwaway7808 12y ago
""" More to the point, if you're buying drugs online you're not supporting local drug dealers and the crime and violence that typically accompany open air drug markets, particularly in inner cities. By cutting those
11.
by throwaway7808 12y ago
Let me give you a clue. Are you in the gravitational field of the Sun? How does it compare with the gravitational field of the Earth? Is it stronger or weaker? Do you feel it? What's the trajectory of the earth in the curved space
12.
by throwaway7808 12y ago
Energy is conserved in any iteraction. And gravity is not a force. Gravity is the curvature of space-time.
13.
by throwaway7808 12y ago
At least in C your initialization functions are first class citizens. Not like in that messed-up language, in which a constructor just should not fail...
14.
by throwaway7808 12y ago
Most likely you and your kids are gonna be wiped out by intellegent machines just in a few decades.
15.
by throwaway7808 12y ago
Most likely you and your kids are gonna be wiped out by intellegent machines just in a few decades.
16.
by throwaway7808 12y ago
Hey, do you want to join a cool startup that I'm working on? I'll look out for you, no worries. Just work and have fun, and I'll take care of the rest. By the way, there's also an investment opportunity, you see I'
17.
by throwaway7808 12y ago
> should be entitled to current-valuation equity that's equal to the difference between their market rate and what they get paid by the startup Rrright. Only a founder can decide to dilute the stock while keeping that quiet, or do a
18.
by throwaway7808 12y ago
Yes, and that's the reward part of the risk/reward equation. I'm actually not concerned at all about the rewards, 'unfairness' or any other philosophical issues. What I don't like is that there's a myth &
19.
by throwaway7808 12y ago
Risk of employees is actually a lot higher than that of a founder. Founders have access to crucial financial information, employees do not. Thus higher risk. Founders have all the control, employees do not. Thus higher risk. Founders ca
20.
by throwaway7808 12y ago
Most likely you and your kids are gonna be wiped out by intellegent machines just in a few decades.
21.
by throwaway7808 12y ago
Depends. In my opinion, for engineers you can have open office rooms with 2-5 people, all engineers/no bullshitting managers. But not more. I've noticed that a lot of work can be done in groups like that...
22.
by throwaway7808 12y ago
It depends. Are you a manager, or PM and is your main responsibility to socialize and play the game? If yes, it is gonna be great! The game is a lot more engaging with the "open office" structure. Are you an engineer? Well... sor
23.
by throwaway7808 12y ago
Yes. In the future intellegent machines will wipe out humans. They would not be very religios about that, just very efficient.
24.
by throwaway7808 12y ago
If you have 1%, most likely you are an early employee. There's a formula: VCs and founders get reach, early employees get screwed and employees get their market salaries.
25.
by throwaway7808 12y ago
By the way, what's the minimum income, to be in top 1% of incomes in the US?
26.
by throwaway7808 12y ago
Most likely you and your kids are gonna be wiped out by intellegent machines just in a few decades.
27.
by throwaway7808 12y ago
AFAIK "chief scientist" title assumes that you, or your team of scientists are doing academic research. And that you publish results of your research. Taking a title like that, while actually not doing it is a borderline fraud. If
28.
by throwaway7808 12y ago
Yes. And these jobs will be taken by AIs.
29.
by throwaway7808 12y ago
I'll be making a prediction here. Coders will be mostly replaced by AIs before automated cars will have become a mainstream.
30.
by throwaway7808 12y ago
Interesting, I did not know that you did not know that.

More ›