throwaway743824

10 ms·

1.
by throwaway743824 10y ago
I'm more of an example of the latter.
2.
by throwaway743824 10y ago
It has to cost something to hide good content if you expect people to take the time to produce or submit quality content and engage with the community. Otherwise you'll end with the things no one cared much about.
3.
by throwaway743824 10y ago
Somewhat. The conditions are sort of awkward since you have to basically start a company, build contacts wherever you are for an investment and then at the same time build contacts in the US and move you company there. I think a better situ
4.
by throwaway743824 10y ago
"People founding startups are a very small subset of overall immigrants." True, even less create successful startups in a timely manner (even though they contribute overall). Which makes them so hard to target. "Also, most pe
5.
by throwaway743824 10y ago
"It wouldn't be hard to have an immigration system which is biased toward useful vs. not useful." I think that's extremely hard in terms of startups. You're essentially expecting the government to select what is val
6.
by throwaway743824 10y ago
Or just monitor the stories that get flagged off the front page (~25 over several weeks according to the post) and take appropriate measures (e.g. restoring with relative time and penalize flaggers). Of course they first have to decide whet
7.
by throwaway743824 10y ago
Does it matter? The author seems representative of exactly the type of users you want in a community like this. Long standing user account, high karma, produces decent comments and great content (the visualizations in the Swype article is a
8.
by throwaway743824 10y ago
If they want to 'protect' the moderators they should use more neutral language focusing on the actions. You can easily say "This account has been x" instead of "We've x this account" or "x has been ch
9.
by throwaway743824 10y ago
You can always find reasons why something has to be a certain way. But at the end of the day, you can't expect to attract and retain curious hackers/entrepreneurs in this way. The author presumably spent some time compiling the or
10.
by throwaway743824 10y ago
I don't think the point is so much about taking them down, as not letting them decide the future. From a larger perspective 2005-2015 is almost like a lost decade of companies implmenting things on new platforms under properitery owner
11.
by throwaway743824 10y ago
I guess one can say it's a similar system. But, while definitions might differ, I'm not sure how capitalist I would call one of the largest government run subway systems in the world [0], half century long water tunneling projects
12.
by throwaway743824 10y ago
Those good people would hopefully want people to hold MIT to a standard when it comes to things like admissions, community involvement, support of students and researchers etc. rather than formal prizes. But maybe (hopefully) this is import
13.
by throwaway743824 10y ago
Toronto/Montreal is still much closer to large US populations in the US north east than Vancouver is to the US south west.
14.
by throwaway743824 10y ago
Something like WeChat really isn't like cards though. It's more like cash, cards and bank transfers in one. Like if most everyone would accept Paypal for everything without fees and it was integrated everywhere (web, store, phone,
15.
by throwaway743824 10y ago
I don't see how that is adding anything to the discussion. If you want to be the leader you actually have to lead. You have to be the one that figures out "the future" and have the solution people didn't know they wanted
16.
by throwaway743824 10y ago
Don't agree. I think that is like saying you can become a professional athlete by just working out everyday. We mostly know what works. It's comradely, career and cash. Most things worth doing isn't going to result in much pr
17.
by throwaway743824 10y ago
Because? I don't see Vancouver "happening" (at least not more than it already is). Being similar to places like Seattle or SF isn't a good thing if you want to compete with them, because you'll always end up behind
18.
by throwaway743824 10y ago
Spoken as the incumbent. Of course it's a technical problem, as least as much as other SV companies. Hard tech hasn't been the edge for SV for many decades and it's getting even less important today. All the big companies has
19.
by throwaway743824 10y ago
They are insecure from the perspective of protecting people from targeted government surveillance though. The security model doesn't support it.