throwaway71271

6 ms·

1.
by throwaway71271 1y ago
as this paper shows, it sees they can do tower of hanoi as well, up to a certain point that is.
2.
by throwaway71271 1y ago
I think you are right, even if I beleve next token prediction can work, I dont think it can happen in this autoregressive way where we fully collapse the token to feed it back in. Can you imagine how much is lost from each torch.multinomial
3.
by throwaway71271 1y ago
> And, even the dumber LLMs would slot in naturally into such a process That is what I am struggling with, it is really easy at the moment to slot LLM and make everything worse. Mainly because its output is coming from torch.multinomial
4.
by throwaway71271 1y ago
Everything is fine I dream if err, if err dreams me.
5.
by throwaway71271 1y ago
Wow! What an amazing story! I started writing forth few months ago, wrote few interpreters, with jit or with types etc, and its just amazing, I think anyone should do it. TBH I don't think any other exercise has thought me as much abou
6.
by throwaway71271 1y ago
> I disagree with that strongly. The LLM is obviously not a human or a person, but it's not a trivial token predictor, either. I am sorry, by no means I think it is a trivial token predictor, or a stochastic parrot of some sort. I t
7.
by throwaway71271 1y ago
Google uses a lot of user feedback data to rate the content, chatgpt cant do that, maybe its for the better, e.g. now chatgpt imports 0 star completely unknown libraries from github into my project, it read their code and deemed useful, but
8.
by throwaway71271 1y ago
I am not sure. For example now I am writing a book for my daughter, I would like to share it when done, it is not written for ad money, example chapter, just so you know what kind of content I mean: https://punkx.org/projekt
9.
by throwaway71271 1y ago
I honestly think that tokens are inhuman, and actually it is harmful for humans to consume tokens. In gpt2 times I used to read gpt generated text a lot, I was working on a game to guess if the text is AI generated or not, and for weeks whi
10.
by throwaway71271 1y ago
https://www.decisionproblem.com/paperclips/index2.html go ahead :)
11.
by throwaway71271 1y ago
btw thats why I hated the old butterfly keyboards, a tiny crumb gets in and then the probability of a key drops to like 80%, or sometimes it double presses. I am very happy that apple moved away from the quest of making the keyboard 0 heigh
12.
Machinist and Machine(punkx.org)
14 points by throwaway71271 1y ago|2 comments
13.
by throwaway71271 1y ago
Reading and "accepting/rejecting" so much AI generated code in the last months has made me a bit burned out and have somewhat of an identity crisis. I have been making more and more time at night to reconnect with the craft.
14.
by throwaway71271 1y ago
I am super conflicted about this kind of AI. I want artists to create the next amazing season of Solo Leveling, but I dont want to wait 1 year for it. You could argue that those tools in the hands of skilled craftsman will create amazing t
15.
by throwaway71271 1y ago
well there is https://collapseos.org/ :)
16.
by throwaway71271 1y ago
R. G. Loeliger Threaded Interpretive Languages Their Design And Implementation[1] is an amazing book, since it was out of print, I printed it on a good 160gsm a4 paper, and I randomly open it every few weeks just to read through it. I stron
17.
Replicube – an open-ended programming puzzle game(store.steampowered.com)
1 points by throwaway71271 1y ago|0 comments
18.
by throwaway71271 2y ago
then you will be even more impressed by Rule 110 being turing complete with a specific background pattern. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_110
19.
Linux on a 70s Typewriter (2024) [video](youtube.com)
1 points by throwaway71271 2y ago|0 comments
20.
by throwaway71271 2y ago
| Name | Semi-private eval | Public eval | |--------------------------------------|-------------------|-------------| | Jeremy Berman | 53.6% | 58.5% |
21.
by throwaway71271 2y ago
> This isn't what the article says... thats not the only thing it says, but it does say it: > The conclusions to be drawn from the points made throughout this paper are reasonably obvious: We need a new language for teaching novi
22.
by throwaway71271 2y ago
I never went to university, but in high school I had two different teachers, and one was hundreds of times better than the other. I am not really sure how teachers get hired, how they are interviewed and assessed, but the system is clearly
23.
by throwaway71271 2y ago
I disagree with the premise of the article. We absolutely do not know how to teach programming both pedagogically and andragogically, you can see that 80% of the students after getting their masters in CS absolutely can not program, do not
24.
by throwaway71271 2y ago
> If I want to understand an individual human being, I must lay aside all scientific knowledge of the average man and discard all theories in order to adopt a completely new and unprejudiced attitude. -- Carl Jung, The Undiscovered Self
25.
by throwaway71271 2y ago
looking at the despair at https://www.reddit.com/r/cscareerquestions i am completely certain people are not above cheating even if its not an app, everything is so cheap and small now, 1mm camera and microphone, and ve
26.
by throwaway71271 2y ago
> But where are they hearing about these effects that get them so concerned? Is it the Australian news? Their friends who have kids? People still talk to other people.
27.
by throwaway71271 2y ago
https://edition.cnn.com/2024/10/30/tech/teen-suicide-charact... there are more extreme cases
28.
by throwaway71271 2y ago
or how much money they lost on missed business
29.
Google Claims World First as AI Finds 0-Day Security Vulnerability(forbes.com)
3 points by throwaway71271 2y ago|0 comments
30.
Illustrating BASIC (1981)(archive.org)
2 points by throwaway71271 2y ago|0 comments

More ›