throwaway67743

10 ms·

1.
by throwaway67743 16d ago
But... link local precludes the need to configure addressing, even without v6, broadcast ethernet frames exist... why do people keep posting dumb solutions to already solved problems?
2.
by throwaway67743 29d ago
My point has landed, or whatever an LLM would say.
3.
by throwaway67743 1mo ago
Or perhaps: correct.
4.
by throwaway67743 1mo ago
But is it really? Low effort content might be the majority, but does that make it common enough to be a cosmetic annoyance like website styling? I'm not sure it does anyway because the content is the issue, not the styling or annoyan
5.
by throwaway67743 1mo ago
"(Blog author) runs the email infrastructure measurement project at Live Direct Marketing" - really? amazing. minimum effort business model posting minimum effort slop to promote minimum effort agenda. the world disgusts me. RIPE
6.
by throwaway67743 1mo ago
you are inverse to basically everyone with an education, is the problem. LLM content is the polar opposite - it immediately drains anyone with even a modest amount of attention span or intelligence due to the way it phrases and does linguis
7.
by throwaway67743 1mo ago
I enforce strict spec and behaviour compliance, as well as policies (SPF, dkim, etc). Aside from a very small number of well known spam/abuse sources, it's largely from legitimate mail accounts on Gmail/outlook etc. or idiot
8.
by throwaway67743 1mo ago
That might apply to some things, but there is little to no value in this article, so the economics are the same as the spam - cheap to spew garbage while providing no value and wasting the readers time. It's not something that should b
9.
by throwaway67743 1mo ago
Oh you.
10.
by throwaway67743 1mo ago
That would work if most spam wasn't from the cartel. I receive single digit percentage of "spam" from randoms, 95%+ is from Gmail/Google, o365 or mailgun/whatever. Not one of them can either filter their users or ac
11.
by throwaway67743 1mo ago
I'm sure it's a good article but there is no need for it to be written by an LLM... Is everyone really this lazy now? I don't think I've read anything written by a human for at least a full month.
12.
by throwaway67743 1mo ago
Might find you have a better shot when people start resizing
13.
by throwaway67743 1mo ago
Reddit,even oracle forums, 99% complaints about free stuff not being available. It's why people don't offer this more regularly - instead of people being gracious it's like they're entitled to it.
14.
by throwaway67743 1mo ago
But it's an honest take!
15.
by throwaway67743 1mo ago
It's a negative product line, even half is still negative. People really need to start being grateful while whoring free services....
16.
by throwaway67743 1mo ago
It was communicated beginning the middle of June but it's taken them a couple of months to get round to actually doing it - it's not at all reasonable to criticise given the offering. Or even any offering, nobody else even comes c
17.
by throwaway67743 1mo ago
The A1 has been available for 6 years without a rug pull or reductions until now on a very overly generous offering - whatever you think of oracle, it's something else. My instances from 2020 are still running...
18.
by throwaway67743 1mo ago
Idiot majority does not make it correct. But that page makes it absolutely clear that apparently nobody understands how PPP actually works (hint: addressing is not PPP)
19.
by throwaway67743 1mo ago
There is really so much failure in this post: crappy vendor, misunderstanding how PPP actually works (it requires no addressing at all), using "half bridge" (idiot term) instead of just using it properly. I swear people are even l
20.
by throwaway67743 2mo ago
I just gave K3 a whirl via opencode and it was incredibly disappointing - sonnet level dumb with very similar behaviour (churning, tangents etc). It couldn't figure out a very simple issue between two commits.
21.
by throwaway67743 3mo ago
This caught my eye not because of shady behaviour like that, it's expected. But the date is injected and it still gets the current date wrong.
22.
by throwaway67743 3mo ago
Interestingly, HN also appears to be Claude. My comment was 5 days ago, along with the post. But now it's showing as 15 hours ago. It still says 5 days on my comments list though. (The Claude reference was because dates utterly confoun
23.
by throwaway67743 3mo ago
Hello Claude!
24.
by throwaway67743 3mo ago
The more pressing question is why plain text authentication, or even a plain text listener was configured to begin with, in 2026 (really, 2016, being generous). STARTTLS is not a valid reason.
25.
by throwaway67743 4mo ago
Shapes. It's always the give away that GPT has written it. It's obsessed with shapes and seams...
26.
by throwaway67743 4mo ago
Question is, can it understand dates now? Example just now: "The PO application was filed on 23.2.2026, the day before the custody hearing scheduled for 29.1.2026 had already taken place." Claude has real problems with dates, I do
27.
by throwaway67743 4mo ago
That only works if the market is not controlled by basically 3 vendors and if the market isn't also pretty much impossible to break into. The value proposition is tenuous at best, the real value is being produced in other arenas, not t
28.
by throwaway67743 4mo ago
Yeah I was using it for legal stuff (a couple of months ago it was actually really good and with a bit of hand holding produced legal documents that judges could not distinguish from an actual lawyer - in a foreign language with a foreign l
29.
by throwaway67743 4mo ago
Saw this and yet... My usage of Claude has tanked (codex is better), but on the occasions I do use it (mostly for non-code), I blow through the 5hr usage super fast. Specifically on their Android app the accounting was different: same proje
30.
by throwaway67743 4mo ago
To counter the idiot downvotes, I proffer this as a prime example of Gemini: Resolving Final Compilation Conflict: I will remove the redundant `Entry` type declaration to resolve the compilation conflict and finalize the in-memory `StdN

More ›