throwaway672000

7 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by throwaway672000 5y ago

   Thalidomide might be what you're thinking of. Didn't realise until now that it wasn't approved in the US until the risks were well known. But in the UK at least "thalidomide was (supposed to be) safe too" is an easy
2. 2.▲
   by throwaway672000 5y ago

   Won't enough images be real matches for them to be looking at it (in low res) for most of their work day?
3. 3.▲
   by throwaway672000 5y ago

   >to check it, they would send in 25 year olds Well, not sure if typo, but the margin of error is the point surely? It's fine that 23 year olds who look 26 slip through as long as 17 year olds who look 23 don't. Otherwise the s
4. 4.▲
   by throwaway672000 5y ago

   It's possible the only reason we would disgree if the rest of the world took this attitude is our own greed. To me what's more obviously wrong whether I'm rich or poor is leaking personal info on employees, HR correspondence
5. 5.▲
   by throwaway672000 5y ago

   I don't think I would see anything wrong with gallons per 100 miles if I was used to it. Especially if it was "gallons per megamile" or whatever. You see (at least in the UK) dishwashers say they only use x litres of water pe