throwaway6449

5 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by throwaway6449 7y ago

   It's pretty nice to see that Reich is literally hammering home that HBD as HBD proponents see it isn't real yet you think it furthers your argument. Three things: 1. That there are population (not race, these are not the same th
2. 2.▲
   by throwaway6449 7y ago

   FYI, Galileo was called out because his science was considered shoddy at the time, notably because of the poor quality of instruments that didn't take things like parallax into account. That he turned out to be right afterwards is more
3. 3.▲
   by throwaway6449 7y ago

   Race isn't well-defined. You can't just wave it away with "uhh some PCA/STRUCTURE plot yields clusters so race is real", that's not how popgen or phylogeny works. Nor can you get away with "butbut muh gene
4. 4.▲
   by throwaway6449 7y ago

   Dawkins hasn't been relevant in the field of evolutionary biology for 15+ years and I don't know why people pay attention to whatever he says just because he built a brand about being an an edgy atheist. There are literally dozens
5. 5.▲
   by throwaway6449 7y ago

   Lol Carl is a hack and he got fired because of that. Reich didn't remotely say things racist wanted to hear. Meanwhile Saini's books got inputs and reviews from all prominent scientists in the field (Graham Coop, Ewan Birney etc.)