throwaway2562

10 ms·

1.
by throwaway2562 6mo ago
Controversially, that would be ‘woke’, but obvs the term is now somewhat tarnished. As the right has an immovable Evangelical wing, so now does the Left. A good word for such people is currently unoccupied.
2.
by throwaway2562 10mo ago
What is the utility of denying it? What do you or anyone else actually get from such obvious absurdity, I wonder? If it helps - and I have doubts - does (say) a working knowledge of Galois theory require more advanced mathematical cognition
3.
by throwaway2562 10mo ago
Good grief. This is what 20 years of language policing has wrought. People who are nervous (hiding behind ‘skeptical’) about words like ‘advanced’ when, by any number of dimensions, human cognition is uncontroversially superior, more advanc
4.
by throwaway2562 10mo ago
An absurd take. The ‘trauma’ people, baggage handlers de nos jours, have already weaponised the phenomenon for political points, before we even know definitively if it exists. Hey ho. Incidentally, nobody yet I see has suggested that epigen
5.
by throwaway2562 1y ago
Here come the police, ever-vigilant for perceived or potential slights. Bless you, Officer.
6.
by throwaway2562 1y ago
Does anyone know if are.na supports private sharing of content within groups? I’ve looked and I cannot see if this simple thing is possible, or not. Then I could use it share moodboards and screenshots with my team: I somewhat dislike Miro
7.
by throwaway2562 1y ago
Do yourself a big favour and read the article before commenting, perhaps? Hint: Schmidhuber has amassed solid evidence over years of digging.
8.
by throwaway2562 1y ago
The real shame of it is that OP claims affiliation to two respectable universities (UCL and Cambridge) and one formerly credible venue (CHI) Mock scholarship is on the rampage. I agree: this stuff does make me understand the yahoos with a d
9.
by throwaway2562 1y ago
What a great story: remarkable how the New Yorker of 1995 has the same efficient but easy-going clarity as 2025.
10.
by throwaway2562 1y ago
This is what a company running out of ideas looks like
11.
by throwaway2562 1y ago
Looks cool! Very polished, I appreciate just how much effort it takes to get something like this out of the door. Couple of questions for OP What is it written in? What will the license be? Context: Currently evaluating the venerable SVGEdi
12.
by throwaway2562 1y ago
How can invest in money laundering? Serious question. No crypto please, I do have some limits.
13.
by throwaway2562 1y ago
Thank you. I will explore.
14.
by throwaway2562 1y ago
What of it? The Loved One (1948) was a bit of a squib at best, tonally a throwback to the earlier Waugh. It’s not very good (imho) so you can see why Terry Southern - who had not much taste - liked it enough to make a film of it, also unsuc
15.
by throwaway2562 1y ago
Very cool, and great selection of tracks. It would help a lot if a track had breaks and fills as well as the main rhythm.
16.
by throwaway2562 2y ago
Just curious: why? It wouldn’t be more funny ha-ha, just more funny strange.
17.
by throwaway2562 2y ago
I’m trying to understand what the ‘spectral’ interpretation of IMM is: but perhaps I shouldn’t https://sander.ai/2024/09/02/spectral-autoregression.html
18.
by throwaway2562 2y ago
Ach. You seem full of (unrelated, unwarranted) ragefulness, and you stand ready to handwave away both scientific studies and actual user experience. Without, I see, providing any grounded counterpoints. As a bonus, anyone who disagrees with
19.
by throwaway2562 2y ago
Not being able to get your kid to sleep because the upstairs flat is now a weekend party place for tourists is… a non-problem? ‘Wonderful’ convenience for tourists, sure. Writing off reasonable objections as ‘ideological zealotry’ from ‘bad
20.
by throwaway2562 2y ago
Rather a lopsided article that misses the point somewhat. Humphrey Smith may be an eccentric and unkind loon, but Sam Smith’s pubs in London are far and away the best chain in town, by some distance. Beautifully maintained or restored inter
21.
by throwaway2562 2y ago
See comment above. You are replying to the wrong person
22.
by throwaway2562 2y ago
Despite all evidence to the contrary.
23.
by throwaway2562 2y ago
Why is it a shame exactly?
24.
by throwaway2562 2y ago
What is the name for #26? It’s somewhat perfect for something I need to visualise, wondered if it has a name and/or a d3 implementation
25.
by throwaway2562 2y ago
What are splats actually useful for, and where are they used?
26.
by throwaway2562 2y ago
Douglas Adams was here in 1982 with the invention of the SEP field ‘An SEP is something we can't see, or don't see, or our brain doesn't let us see, because we think that it's somebody else's problem. That’s what SE
27.
by throwaway2562 2y ago
Alas, poor Jurgen! I knew him, Horatio. A fellow of infinite jest, of most excellent fancy…
28.
by throwaway2562 2y ago
Cuttle is v cool, congratulations! I had previously seen Apparatus and liked it, so I can clearly see the genetic resemblance now ;) I’m wondering how many of you are on the team, and does it actually support you as a business yet? Even for
29.
by throwaway2562 2y ago
The point on interpretability is scientific applications is in symbolic regression - MLPs cannot always spit out an equation for some data set: KANs can.
30.
by throwaway2562 2y ago
Guy writes 10 bazillion sub-lit-crit words on rollercoasters, fails to mention Euler spirals and clothoids, where the beauty is, where maths guides and protects meat. A depressing lack of curiosity by the author. https://thatsmat

More ›