Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
throwaway15908
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
1.
▲
by
throwaway15908
4y ago
Sounds like a good way to weed out middle management ;)
2.
▲
by
throwaway15908
4y ago
> correlated to progressivism how? also, there are better correlations to crime, than cop hatred, like darn communism is the first i can think of
3.
▲
by
throwaway15908
4y ago
>how this token relates to the vault, nor how decrypting the token is a necessary dependency to decrypting the vault. That is actually a good point i didnt fully understand myself, let me check ... The only thing i could find quickly is
4.
▲
by
throwaway15908
4y ago
Ok, fine. I still dont feel comfortable, but here is the link. https://github.com/proxemy/dotfiles/blob/master/scripts/toke... The vault is regular kdbx with an additional password file. Thank you f
5.
▲
by
throwaway15908
4y ago
But an attacker can never tell if the current guess to crack the token is the right one. Its just random noise in the end.
6.
▲
by
throwaway15908
4y ago
I am not a cryptographer, so please keep that in mind. > An attacker that does have access to vault and token is given the ability to try brute force and to look for cracks that might allow decrypting the vault. My reasoning for the toke
7.
▲
by
throwaway15908
4y ago
I should have said that the token file is several kb in size, about 1/20 of my vault size, and of course random noise. I am aware that future hardware or algorithms could bring down the cost of brute forcing it, thats why ive choose se
8.
▲
Ask HN: Save, Public Password Vaults?
1 points
by
throwaway15908
4y ago
|
13 comments
9.
▲
by
throwaway15908
4y ago
I dont know why you get down voted because you are absolutely right. I would go even further and demand regulators to define standards to enable migration or self hosting.
10.
▲
by
throwaway15908
4y ago
Are you sure, there is no signal in background radiation? Someone should check.
11.
▲
by
throwaway15908
4y ago
I really want to see that risk assesment.
12.
▲
by
throwaway15908
4y ago
Its easy and it starts with language.
13.
▲
by
throwaway15908
4y ago
Wouldn't it be feasible to replace this "get your own domain" part just by letting tor doing the lookup for some introduced .onion site. My reasoning is, that this could get much faster adoption rates and/but is also sel
14.
▲
by
throwaway15908
4y ago
Degrading social care systems and social mobility is actually to blame for this. This is what OP is missing in his/her rant.
15.
▲
by
throwaway15908
4y ago
Black people were discriminated in the US from the beginning. This discrimination continued long after civil rights reforms in public and private institutions. Even if you could magically eliminate racism in every human brain on earth with
16.
▲
by
throwaway15908
4y ago
A system is either sustainable or not, this is independent of population. The sustainable level of consumption is dependent on population.
17.
▲
by
throwaway15908
4y ago
I was about to write "The Problem we both have is mislabeling" but then i realized that we dont have the same problem. From my perspective, conservatives/rights often stand out with blatant and harmful falsehoods. Even in you
18.
▲
by
throwaway15908
4y ago
From broad brain traits like sexual orientation down to smaller ones like spatial perception or emotional intelligence, a young brain has certain development windows in which a trait or ability can get more or less developed. You could even
19.
▲
by
throwaway15908
4y ago
So you agree with me, that left and woke is not the same thing. Whats odd thou is, (1) there is no clear definition of wokeism, like its an arbitrary stereotype used by demagogues and (2), that woke is often displayed on the other side of r
20.
▲
by
throwaway15908
4y ago
I think, you are contrasting your peers to a propagandistic caricature. Or how easy can you fit in that image "moderate" leftists like bernie sanders or noam chomsky? What is the difference between woke and left?
21.
▲
by
throwaway15908
4y ago
This is dangerous bs. Easy to swallow for the uneducated masses. Putting all moral consideration aside, imagine you could totally depopulate two continents of your choosing. Why should any problem of modern economics be solved by that? The
22.
▲
by
throwaway15908
4y ago
>Free speech! So important! >No no, not free voting. How do you stay calm and polite? I cant comprehend.
23.
▲
by
throwaway15908
4y ago
Why are they even encrypting the stuff? 1024 bit key? On such a long term mission, KISS is pretty crucial. EDIT: Probably some military doctrine. For science you monster.
24.
▲
by
throwaway15908
4y ago
>Why are 200ppm sustainable? The higher CO2 levels of long gone times where probably not even remotely a problem for those critters around, because evolution had plenty of time to do its thing. Your whole point of "but what about ba
25.
▲
by
throwaway15908
4y ago
Consider it like this. Sustainability is _only_ a waste management system that enables recycling rates of 90% or higher (which is damn hard). CO2 is also just one of many waste products, we totally dont care about, but _must_ to sustain our
26.
▲
by
throwaway15908
4y ago
No one is born as your foe, they gradually become it. Fleeing into "but imagine what china would do" is exactly that, its creation. Tracing the cirlce of violence back you can only state, that it has always been this way but that
27.
▲
by
throwaway15908
4y ago
Imagine a world ... imagine a united states in which people just respect this simple moral of not killing people by any means for any reason. Just imagine.
28.
▲
by
throwaway15908
4y ago
On a broad scope, you could solve this at compile time. The source simply does not compile when filesystem or networking crates/builtins are not defined. If you want to have more fine grained white listing, like only grant access to a
29.
▲
by
throwaway15908
4y ago
Tangetial question: Seen all the recent supply chain attacks, is there a way to defend FOSS projects with something like project defined capabilities for every third party dependency? So eg. you could include a math lib and mask everything
30.
▲
by
throwaway15908
4y ago
Next step, "for the wellbeing of its citizens", the chinese government will stop censoring too critical content for a healther relationship to issues to discuss. I hope this trend continues.
More ›