throwaway150

6 ms·

1.
by throwaway150 7mo ago
Page is gone. Archived copy: https://web.archive.org/web/20260105115129/https://devblogs.... It is very worrying that people with no ethics work for these trillion dollar companies who are supposed to be
2.
by throwaway150 7mo ago
Exactly. I don't understand why so many people think the maintainer has some obligation to accept the funds even when they aren't comfortable doing so. The terms of engagement changed. The decision changed. If they want to forgo t
3.
by throwaway150 7mo ago
> I'm not debating it... we're not debating it. You're having it explained to you. You have not explained anything. > That would be the very definition of a bubble. Just as is your bubble.
4.
by throwaway150 7mo ago
> if you are going to do something for a living, make sure it is NOT scalable. Great advice but difficult to action though. I mean 10 years back I'd have thought programming is that thing which is not scalable. I had every reason to
5.
by throwaway150 7mo ago
> It's not really debatable. Very weird for you to start a reply like this when we are literally debating it. > You say "all of us" Yes, I mean those of who don't use git-flow. That's what I meant by "a
6.
by throwaway150 7mo ago
So is there anything that would actually satisfy crowd here? Offer $25K and it is "How dare a trillion dollar company pay so little?" Offer $250K and it is "Hmm. Exception! Must be marketing!" What precisely is an accept
7.
by throwaway150 7mo ago
> Why do none of you understand that this is for Anna's archives official torrents only? Because you are on the site where people who have no understanding of the domain or the problem still feel it necessary to share their opinion
8.
by throwaway150 7mo ago
> Yup, there would have been much less Git buy-in if it weren't for git flow I don't buy this. I've never used git-flow in life. No team I've worked for has ever used git-flow. Yet all of us have been using Git for ag
9.
by throwaway150 7mo ago
If a PR claims to solve a problem that I don't need, then I can skip its review because I'll never merge it. I don't think every PR needs reviewing. Some PRs we can ignore just by taking a quick look at what the PR claims to
10.
by throwaway150 7mo ago
> Every PR needs to be reviewed. Why would you review a PR that you are never going to merge?
11.
Minifeed(minifeed.net)
4 points by throwaway150 7mo ago|0 comments
12.
by throwaway150 7mo ago
This I understand very well. It wasn't my question though. No, I wasn't asking anybody to organize a structure like Wikipedia. I was challenging the parent's comment where they said: >> This would be overwhelmed with AI
13.
by throwaway150 7mo ago
> The sole person running this site doesn't find the same things interesting than you do. That misses the point. I know the site is run by a single maintainer and they are free to accept or decline whatever they choose. I have no qu
14.
by throwaway150 7mo ago
Appreciate the reply. My submissions fell within the scope though. I think I took the rejections too personally. Sorry for that. I appreciate the time and effort you put into maintaining the site. I will give it a rest. Sorry for being a pa
15.
by throwaway150 7mo ago
I tested with the 3 major browsers and all 3 block it as "Suspected Phishing". So looks like the system is working as designed. Lookalike websites serving malware have always existed. So this isn't exactly news. But the brows
16.
by throwaway150 7mo ago
> This would be overwhelmed with AI slop within days. Why so? What's the logic? With ooh.directory, one person is curating it. With a community project, 10 people may curate it. What makes 10 people curating the list more susceptibl
17.
by throwaway150 7mo ago
> So what? This website is just some man's collection of blogs, not a government registry funded by tax money. It does not seem to even take public donations. Why shouldn't its maintainer be allowed to exercise personal judgeme
18.
by throwaway150 7mo ago
> You do seem particularly offended or annoyed that some blogs you suggested have not yet appeared on the site. I'm not offended. Just a little frustrated that I took the time to make some submissions of blogs I thought were missing
19.
by throwaway150 7mo ago
To be fair, I appreciate the technical effort it takes to build and maintain a directory like this. It isn't lost on me that many people like it. Kudos to the author for creating this. I absolutely don't mean to be negative about
20.
by throwaway150 7mo ago
This looks great. Your https://minifeed.net/about page is really nice too. Well done! You should make it a top level post if you haven't already
21.
by throwaway150 7mo ago
> it just feels so low effort when it's just "look what AI made" I don't know how many more of these posts will hit HN front page. It's like this forum has been taken over by vibecoder sloppers. what is the intel
22.
by throwaway150 7mo ago
> You either trust it or you don't. don't see why it has to be this way. It doesn't take much to tell us what the review process is like and what gets added and what does not. If I know in advance that the blogs I submit a
23.
by throwaway150 7mo ago
I've submitted entries but they never get added. I have no idea how they decide what makes it into the directory and what doesn't so I've stopped trying.
24.
by throwaway150 7mo ago
>> No blogs or categories were found matching emacs. > OK then. Exactly. This is a deeper problem with ooh.directory, that the review process is opaque. They do not explain why something is added or rejected. I do not care much abo
25.
by throwaway150 7mo ago
The problem with https://ooh.directory/ is that nobody can tell what gets added and what doesn't. Submissions go through an opaque review process and a lot of good submissions don't make it. Just try searching you
26.
by throwaway150 7mo ago
> I get this point, but there's a risk to this kind of thinking: putting all the responsibility on "the human operator of record" is an easy way to deflect it from other parties: such as the people who built the AI agent s
27.
by throwaway150 7mo ago
> if you publish something to the public, you are responsible for it to a degree. Have you read the open source licenses? They say the exact opposite.
28.
by throwaway150 7mo ago
Yes, I read that and directly addressed that in my reply to @jodrellblank above. Repeating it here: "However noble the foundation's mission sounds, the reality is that Matrix is a complex protocol sustained by people investing the
29.
by throwaway150 7mo ago
Did you even read the link I gave you? It already addresses exactly the scenario you mention. That no matter how obviously sarcastic the comment is, it can still be seen as a sincere comment. Please re-read it. But TBH in this case I couldn
30.
by throwaway150 7mo ago
> A standards-conformant implementation of vi is absolutely required to be present No arguments there. This is all correct. The question is: Is Vim not standards-conformant? If Vim isn't standards-conformant, I agree some people wil

More ›