throwaway09432

4 ms·

1.
by throwaway09432 4y ago
I mean if I have a NonEmptyArray say xs, and I then xs.map(x=>2*x), will the result of this expression be a NonEmptyArray ?
2.
by throwaway09432 4y ago
Can you map over this and preserve the NonEmptyArray type?
3.
by throwaway09432 4y ago
The production of this gadget will create more pollution.
4.
by throwaway09432 4y ago
Typescript is a good try, but ultimately our favourite JS runtime errors still happen, even with all the strictest ts settings. Syntactically it is quite clumsy, you can see the uninspired mix of C++ and Java in there. The typings now alth
5.
by throwaway09432 4y ago
Does carbon filter this stuff?
6.
by throwaway09432 4y ago
Personally I prefer haml, in my opinion JSX is grotesque.
7.
by throwaway09432 4y ago
Honestly, all I care about is speed. Couple of word swaps here and there using a thesaurus, who gives a shit.
8.
by throwaway09432 4y ago
It works!
9.
by throwaway09432 4y ago
Python lambda syntax is ugly as hell.
10.
by throwaway09432 4y ago
Very tastefully done. Every one of these items is a huge improvement. This one in particular drives me crazy: `x.map(($) => $.name)`, `x.map .name` is almost Haskell level terseness. Can this all not be done as experimental typescript t
11.
by throwaway09432 4y ago
>"attention seeking" Oh I stand by that comment. It is my opinion, did it offend you? I'm curious why you even felt the need to comment. Not every Briton has the power to do what she did. So the article is essentially just
12.
by throwaway09432 4y ago
Reading it back you are indeed correct. I found the article misleading.
13.
by throwaway09432 4y ago
As pointed out below, she still lives in London after all this verbiage. https://twitter.com/intent/user?screen_name=byameliahill Edit - Censored [flagged] because we are apparently not allowed to criticise. Pathetic.
14.
by throwaway09432 4y ago
So basically after all that, you are quitting an in-office role for a remote role.
15.
by throwaway09432 4y ago
>I'm a little bit butthurt that no one wants to gaze in adoration at my cool toy That's life. Did you call up the bus company and thank them for engineering a bus to get you to work safely?
16.
by throwaway09432 4y ago
I can't believe they chose an array for the Tuple type. Which has no sensible equality definition as arrays in JS are references.
17.
by throwaway09432 4y ago
Ok, so when registering on a new site you don't mind waiting back to hear from the server after clicking submit, to find out your passwords don't match, or don't meet the required policy? That's fine. But the majority of
18.
by throwaway09432 4y ago
Emphatically yes. The most popular UI framework's dropdown component, documentation reads as follows: "Dropdowns are toggleable, contextual overlays for displaying lists of links and more. They’re made interactive with the include
19.
by throwaway09432 4y ago
This is just the same argument as the comments upthread rehashed. In the absolute most minimalist, hair pullingly annoying implementation, that is correct. However the polish you are used to on dropdowns plus countless other controls you in
20.
by throwaway09432 4y ago
Sure, but you are talking about a complete minimalist implementation, one that before all of this Javascript explosion, made people pull their hair out. For example you need javascript for dropdowns or form validation to begin with. I think
21.
by throwaway09432 4y ago
>I do very little on the web where I actually want there to be code running on my document. Just some random examples, but how do you do your tax, pay your bills, buy/sell stuff online, make appointments etc?