throw74774

5 ms·

1.
by throw74774 3y ago
Chinese spending has increased too.
2.
by throw74774 3y ago
Earlier you said “people contribute without any monetary incentives”, and now you are admitting that they do need monetary incentives because there is no UBI. Which is the truth?
3.
by throw74774 3y ago
> Did you miss the parts where I mentioned that private individuals and corporations can also fund their own software, as we do today? You aren’t being honest. Today we’re allowed to fund our own software and use it as we please for pr
4.
by throw74774 3y ago
Earlier you said: > In my viewpoint, something one makes which can be built upon by another freely and without limit is what helps humanity. Now you are saying that LLMs, and maybe even all software, should only be funded by the approval
5.
by throw74774 3y ago
Probably not: https://theconversation.com/chinas-military-might-is-much-cl...
6.
by throw74774 3y ago
Who would decide what to fund?
7.
by throw74774 3y ago
> where people contribute without any monetary incentives. First of all you added in the word ‘monetary’, to straw-man the position. Secondly, even if we run with your straw-man, I see little evidence this is true. Most successful pro
8.
by throw74774 3y ago
Why should just LLMs be funded that way and not all software?
9.
by throw74774 3y ago
All jobs are artificially kept, as would UBI be. They are all artifacts of the law. Money is a way to allocate resources, and technological progress depends on people having incentives to contribute. Do you think LLMs are a natural phenome
10.
by throw74774 3y ago
How do you propose that LLMs are paid for?
11.
by throw74774 3y ago
What do you mean they aren’t paying their fair share? You just said they bought the rights. Also it seems like you are saying we should just pre-judge cases without using the courts. Basically just end the rule of law. Not sure that’s a
12.
by throw74774 3y ago
You cannot extend anyone’s work if you have no food or resources.
13.
by throw74774 3y ago
It dismantled the most sophisticated network that that know about.
14.
by throw74774 3y ago
How does it help humanity as a whole if nobody is able to capture any value for their work?
15.
by throw74774 3y ago
Why won’t the police be supplied with countermeasures and drones of their own?
16.
by throw74774 3y ago
Not necessarily. There are health disadvantages that come from being taller, and also from having higher caloric intake. It could be that we’re adapted to less food, and when we have more we get both taller and less healthy on average.
17.
by throw74774 3y ago
If this were true, people would have died of scurvy at random as opposed to only when forced into a restricted diet at sea.
18.
by throw74774 3y ago
Dunno - touch devices are already very popular for music editing and production. No reason they shouldn’t be for video too.
19.
by throw74774 3y ago
The same argument could be made about platforms that allow alternative app stores, and those that don’t. Both are available for people to choose from. Why does DHH consider choice to be good in once instance and bad ad in the other?
20.
by throw74774 3y ago
Benevolence isn’t enough. They also have to be really smart, competent, and motivated.
21.
by throw74774 3y ago
Every democracy has this.
22.
by throw74774 3y ago
Sounds like they’re going to make it into a portal.
23.
by throw74774 3y ago
I like the idea that parts of the ‘should’ be free and open, but I’m curious how the people who work on these things would have time to do so if not paid. Are you suggesting that they should be paid by the government - I.e. out of taxes? Or