threepts

6 ms·

1.
by threepts 2mo ago
I hope you have a few million dollars, the model requires more than a terabyte of vram unless you lobotomize it a bit.
2.
Show HN: Lean64 – doom64 style FPS on Lean 4(github.com)
2 points by threepts 2mo ago|0 comments
3.
by threepts 4mo ago
When intelligence is a commercial commodity, it is only bound to happen that the rich gatekeep it to secure their socioeconomic status. But, I think, with every revolution, hierarchies have only historically fallen only for the former serfs
4.
by threepts 4mo ago
He statistically is the second coming of Christ Nobel and several breakthroughs in nature.
5.
by threepts 4mo ago
Demis was boon to a rather poor family, he used his own money to buy his first computer (from chess winnings.) His father didn't have a steady job even, he is truly a black swan.
6.
by threepts 4mo ago
All of the major model's memory are handled by smaller more specific models. I do not know about the future, but I believe, like the human brain (the amylgada + cerebral cortex), AGI will have smaller but more specific submodels runnin
7.
by threepts 4mo ago
Hahaha this hits home too hard, back in early 2000s people would moan all the time whenever they spotted a hint of autotune, in 2026 its the industry standard. I think its really speaks on the incredible ability of people to be able to be s
8.
by threepts 4mo ago
Before internet existed, people went to clubs and malls, I wonder if they still do it now?
9.
by threepts 4mo ago
You can read the paper here: https://labs.scale.com/papers/swe_bench_pro TL;DR its very effective as it directly tests model on REAL codebases: "The benchmark is constructed from GPL-style copyleft repositories an
10.
by threepts 4mo ago
That is why we have SWE bench pro, they test architecture design too, turns out 1000 dollars of tokens outperform 10k dollars of labor in meta design.
11.
by threepts 5mo ago
Do you believe skilled immigration is overall detriment or increment to the American economy?
12.
by threepts 5mo ago
Knowledge is not an apple tree, my machine can read all the 100 million books and those 100 million books still remain there. You act like it's an zero sum game, it is not.
13.
by threepts 5mo ago
Do not agree with what you say at all. some people are usually afraid of going out because people like you label them narcissistic and solipsistic so they stick to LLMs.
14.
by threepts 5mo ago
Yes and it is still impressive even with regard to that. In the near future we will probably have a mini 50B parameter model prompting the bigger model and we would have these results consistently.
15.
by threepts 5mo ago
This was GPT with 2 orders of magnitude of less compute. Imagine what 5.5 is capable of.
16.
by threepts 5mo ago
Like a lot of AI scams you will see nowadays, its quite easy to circumvent AI detection. If they implement an "bot" badge which has false positives 80 percent of the times, it will DAMAGE the human artists more.
17.
by threepts 5mo ago
The thing about Spotify is that is NOT driven by record labels, it is an platform for the individual meaning an individual can upload their music in an laissez-faire situation. If they disallow AI artists tomorrow, they are going against wh
18.
by threepts 5mo ago
Criticism is healthy and != maiming, but it is apparent that mainstream culture nowadays labels "AI Art" consumers as dumb and tasteless. I think this is maiming. >"the idea that we should "close our ears" is of
19.
by threepts 5mo ago
You can support real human artists all you want, that is your choice. That is not purism. Purism is saying, like a lot of intent in this thread, people who listen to AI music are dumb and tasteless.
20.
by threepts 5mo ago
"soulless" is a term YOU label people with for enjoying a certain type of music. This is your problem, not the people's problem for enjoying this sort of music. But I agree with your second point, an AI should NOT BE able to
21.
by threepts 5mo ago
AI slop is quite antithetical to Spotify's business model, they would actually lose money if say tomorrow, AI music dominates the charts, when AI music gets that good, people can just generate their own music and leave Spotify back in
22.
by threepts 5mo ago
Bruno Mars started as an Elvis Presley impersonator (likely without his permission as he was dead at that time), can we say he stole his job? People take ideas from other people all the time, my view is if machines do it, it isn't much
23.
by threepts 5mo ago
No one is forcing you to listen to Spotify. You are free to buy a turntable and play all the non-sloppy music. Seeing the popularity of some AI songs, people DO want to hear to this sort of music.
24.
by threepts 5mo ago
On an off note, I do not get why moral puritans disparage the general public for listening to AI songs? If they are "soulless" then they should close their ears rather than trying to maim others.
25.
by threepts 5mo ago
Purists have some agenda against AI that it's "soulless" and people shouldn't be allowed to enjoy that sort of music. Remember when Radiohead launched in rainbows all digital and a LOT of people protested?
26.
by threepts 5mo ago
If AI music sells like you proclaim, it would be bad for spotify to NOT ban it, since it is printing money.
27.
by threepts 5mo ago
I would argue AI artists are antithetical to their business model, when people can generate their own versions of popular IP, they'll just use that.
28.
by threepts 5mo ago
NVIDIA has such a big moat around their CUDA architecture such that I don't think AMD will ever be able to outcompete them in AI compute unless they somehow find 2-3 nobel prize level breakthroughs today.
29.
by threepts 5mo ago
I think these binary labels are too simple to describe him.
30.
by threepts 5mo ago
There were never any days where leaders stood by their words. People have always used lies as tools to maintain their power whether it is the Roman Empire or 21st century AI companies. It is just human nature.

More ›