Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
thomasrambaud
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
1.
▲
by
thomasrambaud
14y ago
I must admit I needed sometimes to be sure of what this website is presenting because the domain name talks about "yourtime", which is "my" time, but I couldn't find anything related to me at a glance. Shouldn't it be "ourtime.intridea.com"
2.
▲
by
thomasrambaud
14y ago
You mean, like what started in 2012 ? Social networks are know widely known, meaning they became boring and non-innovations.
3.
▲
by
thomasrambaud
14y ago
Not necessary unemployment, maybe conversion. Perhaps cleaning industries will take care of providing and deploying hydrophobic substances in toilets, firms, public services etc. Or maybe as you suggest it will create a completly new market
4.
▲
by
thomasrambaud
14y ago
Very interesting technology, known since more than 10 years now and widespread in 2007-8 on the WWW. I guess many applications will be found in every day life.
5.
▲
by
thomasrambaud
14y ago
I find it a bit the overkill. If you'd like to implement Python in the browser, at least make sure to write a good implementation. An implementation written in JavaScript, is not a good implementation.
6.
▲
by
thomasrambaud
14y ago
Not using a CSS rule in a single page doesn't mean you don't use it elsewhere => the generated CSS is necessarily wrong. This tool is useless but being a POC.
7.
▲
by
thomasrambaud
14y ago
Same for me. I think Forrst is kinda dead, I'm ranked #4 (was #1) since 1 year now, and I did no activity.
8.
▲
by
thomasrambaud
14y ago
Yeah, sure, say that to Facebook & Twitter founders (to name the most known). People can sometimes have sufficient genius to handle creating then founding if the product is valuable.
9.
▲
by
thomasrambaud
14y ago
Yes, there's ages similar services exist : http://www.dummyimages.com/
10.
▲
by
thomasrambaud
14y ago
Firebug is a lot better.
11.
▲
by
thomasrambaud
14y ago
This is true, but APIs are often versionned. Concerning efficiency this is true CSS / XPath processors, at least, both offer very nice performances. But download 70KB of HTML each time you only need a single data, where the API request cost
12.
▲
by
thomasrambaud
14y ago
I think the author just completly missed the point with API vs Screen scraping. The API allows for accessing structured data. Even if the website changes once, the datas would be accessible the same way through the API. Whereas, the author,