thomas943

6 ms·

1.
by thomas943 11y ago
Labeling my comment as vitriol is a pretty insubstantial exaggeration. For all either one of us knows, the author has not given any thought to how their knee-jerk blog post will affect them years from now, when they've tired of playing
2.
by thomas943 11y ago
> I hope that you translate your passion into using technology to truly help make the world a better place. I wouldn't hold out too much hope for that. It sounds like they quit because they would rather play with pokemons.
3.
by thomas943 11y ago
> Can this post be laden with slightly more privilege? Sadly, it probably was laden with even more obnoxious privilege and what we are reading is the edited version. I'm in my late twenties and I am constantly amazed by how pathetic
4.
by thomas943 11y ago
No, you're going to have to do the legwork of going to one of the many other pro-fluoridation sites to read those studies. Then, depending on how interested you are in the truth, you'll have to weigh all of the findings, and even
5.
by thomas943 11y ago
Just so I understand where you are coming from, you view peer-reviewed studies as "woo"?
6.
by thomas943 11y ago
The peer reviewed studies were not created by that website. That page just lists the links to studies that were published in peer reviewed journals. I'm not sure how any of this relates to vaccines, since we are talking about fluoride.
7.
by thomas943 11y ago
If you're interested to know how and why you've been conditioned to think that way, look up Edward Bernays and his involvement with getting fluoride into the water supply of a number of countries. In short, he's known as the
8.
by thomas943 11y ago
I don't know about acidity, but fluoride has been implicated in many health problems. Here's a list of peer reviewed studies: http://fluoridealert.org/studytracker/?effect=&type=reviews&...