thisgoesnowhere

4 ms·

1.
by thisgoesnowhere 1y ago
> But regulation can be a prison where you can pay to be free. As opposed to no regulation where you can't? I don't understand this sentiment at all.
2.
by thisgoesnowhere 2y ago
I guess you are the former? What incentive is there to own a negative income asset unless you are lying and you actually are net positive. Unless of course you are the latter and you are claiming that someone should bail you out? "I&#x
3.
by thisgoesnowhere 2y ago
Then sell? I don't cry about the money I lost investing in startups I just keep investing. Why are you crying about the money you are losing like you are supposed to be absolutely guaranteed to make money? The reason you aren't se
4.
by thisgoesnowhere 2y ago
Same reason as in real life over time everyone will be a renter. We subsidize landlords and as a result they have effectively unlimited capital to throw at additional properties meaning the price perpetually goes up and they have more asset
5.
by thisgoesnowhere 2y ago
Restaurants solve the problem of lack of time not absence of food.
6.
by thisgoesnowhere 2y ago
Most people drink most people aren't horrible parents. You are working at the extremes. And yeah some extremes are bad.
7.
by thisgoesnowhere 2y ago
I wasn't referring to this article.
8.
by thisgoesnowhere 2y ago
I mean there is absolutely no reason to think that AI (broadly) and blockchain are going to follow similar trajectories. I agree that every company becoming an "AI company" is not in the cards. However, I think there is going to b
9.
by thisgoesnowhere 2y ago
He's not just out of touch he's actively pushing pretty horrific shit like the abolition of the state. He also agrees with Balaji about everything and therefore should not be trusted.
10.
by thisgoesnowhere 2y ago
Crony capitalism is such an intellectual cop-out. The people who say this garbage would never let any other ideology weasel its way out of the effects of their system in practice, but for some bizarre reason, the giga brains at Reason are a
11.
by thisgoesnowhere 2y ago
This is engagement farming. You write a bot that is able to look for similar content from the past and copy paste the top comments and replies. THis has been happening since the beginning of time. I remember seeing this on college humor. Th
12.
by thisgoesnowhere 2y ago
This is a completely out of reach solution for most people.
13.
by thisgoesnowhere 2y ago
Yeah also the non compete stuff is absolutely fantastic even if it only affects those with middle class income. Shits happening again and I'm here for it. Constant gridlock in passing laws is terrible.
14.
by thisgoesnowhere 2y ago
The team I work on processes 5B+ tokens a month (and growing) and I'm the EM overseeing that. Here are my take aways 1. There are way too many premature abstractions. Langchain, as one of may examples, might be useful in the future but
15.
by thisgoesnowhere 2y ago
My ideas are fleshed out just fine, you are being needlessly pedantic. Noone needs to enumerate every contingency to agree with a law passing or being enforced. You live in a fantasy world.
16.
by thisgoesnowhere 2y ago
I did answer the question, your questions are stupid and don't deserve an answer.
17.
by thisgoesnowhere 2y ago
It must be really hard to navigate the world when you think there should be never changing rules for every possible situation. I feel really sorry for you and anyone who things that laws are IFTTT style rules. Hope you find happiness at som
18.
by thisgoesnowhere 2y ago
I'm not answering your questions because they are stupid and you are just trying to cause inaction by being overly verbose. > But first, no one was talking about Apple and Netflix teaming up. I said Apple instead of Facebook to show
19.
by thisgoesnowhere 2y ago
> Your citation gets trotted out all of the time in these arguments like anyone in 2024 can’t put a video on a website and distribute it anywhere in the world. It's about scale, if you didn't read my first message then that&#x2
20.
by thisgoesnowhere 2y ago
The law can be written in a way that leaves it up for interpretation. It's not a simple IFTTT statement, what's why judges exist and why they make rulings that get cited in other cases. It's a feature of our system that I don
21.
by thisgoesnowhere 2y ago
This slippery slope/where do you draw the line argument is very weak. It's like saying me accidentally spilling a bit while doing a oil change in my garage is the same as BP spilling hundreds of thousands of gallons of crude. Scal
22.
by thisgoesnowhere 2y ago
Direct RSS from the source does this as well. What's the difference?
23.
by thisgoesnowhere 2y ago
You can't invest in M-Pesa tho so it's obviously very bad /s
24.
by thisgoesnowhere 2y ago
Interesting how different people's minds are. I find the exact opposite problem, I go with old faithful over new. It's for this reason that when I put my clothes away I simply take the stack of clothes in my dresser out, put all t
25.
by thisgoesnowhere 2y ago
Im not conspiracy minded but if you go to the /r/Canada subreddit it is so ridiculously pro Pierre Poilievre that I think something is up. Not a single one of the 3 parties in Canada have a likeable head, it's shocking to see
26.
by thisgoesnowhere 3y ago
What? Uber bought their way into the market it's the exact problem that the person you are replying to is trying to address?
27.
by thisgoesnowhere 3y ago
Finally someone who has thought through the problem and come out with the right solution. Great stuff
28.
by thisgoesnowhere 3y ago
Would you apply the same logic to how the market for real estate unfairly rewards previous entrants? My parents have seen a 4x increase in the value of their house in 20 years, is that unfair?
29.
by thisgoesnowhere 3y ago
It's probably a good idea to get input from the people on the ground doing things. Lobbyists are not exactly that as currently formulatd, but they are supposed to be the way for companies to express their opinions. They have become pay
30.
by thisgoesnowhere 3y ago
Well either that or what they were doing is just obviously illegal and they should be at fault for it.

More ›